These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25629432)

  • 21. The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional.
    Fagerland MW; Lydersen S; Laake P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():91. PubMed ID: 23848987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving and extending the McNemar test using the Bayesian method.
    Ogura T; Yanagimoto T
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(14):2455-66. PubMed ID: 26783041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A free gift: an adaptive strategy in a single-arm trial using an exact test through the binomial distribution.
    Wang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 23075012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.
    Qiu SF; Tang NS; Tang ML; Pei YB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):857-71. PubMed ID: 20183448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sample size calculation for the Power Model for dose proportionality studies.
    Sethuraman VS; Leonov S; Squassante L; Mitchell TR; Hale MD
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 17323313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Test for the consistency of noninferiority from multiple clinical trials.
    Yan X; Wang MC; Su X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 17365223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An efficient and exact approach for detecting trends with binary endpoints.
    Shan G; Ma C; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
    Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 22162106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An alternative approach to assess exchangeability of a test treatment and the standard treatment with normally distributed response.
    Tsong Y; Shen M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 17365227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian approach to noninferiority trials for proportions.
    Gamalo MA; Wu R; Tiwari RC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):902-19. PubMed ID: 21830922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of performance of some enrichment designs dealing with high placebo response in psychiatric clinical trials.
    Chen YF; Yang Y; Hung HM; Wang SJ
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jul; 32(4):592-604. PubMed ID: 21540126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptive group sequential test with changing patient population.
    Feng H; Liu Q
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):662-78. PubMed ID: 22651107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the assessment of dose proportionality: a comparison of two slope approaches.
    Cheng B; Chow SC; Su WL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006 May; 16(3):385-92. PubMed ID: 16724492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Corrected profile likelihood confidence interval for binomial paired incomplete data.
    Pradhan V; Menon S; Das U
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 23296487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An adaptive two-stage dose-response design method for establishing proof of concept.
    Franchetti Y; Anderson SJ; Sampson AR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1124-54. PubMed ID: 23957520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Noninferiority Studies with Multiple New Treatments and Heterogeneous Variances.
    Huang LC; Wen MJ; Cheung SH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):958-71. PubMed ID: 24918478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On sample size determination in multi-armed confirmatory adaptive designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):802-17. PubMed ID: 21516570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of homogeneity of treatment effect in adaptive multicenter clinical trials.
    Chen L; Tamura RN
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 9547427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sample size adaptation in fixed-dose combination drug trial.
    James Hung HM; Wang SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22651108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Equivalence assessment for interchangeability based on two-sided tests.
    Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(6):1312-31. PubMed ID: 25032976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Matched analysis for paired binary data (McNemar test).
    Koletsi D; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):222-223. PubMed ID: 28024778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.