262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25630311)
1. A psycholinguistic database for traditional Chinese character naming.
Chang YN; Hsu CH; Tsai JL; Chen CL; Lee CY
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 25630311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.
Su IF; Yum YN; Lau DK
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2989-3008. PubMed ID: 36002627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese.
Liu Y; Shu H; Li P
Behav Res Methods; 2007 May; 39(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 17695344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Norms for name agreement, familiarity, subjective frequency, and imageability for 348 object names in Tunisian Arabic.
Boukadi M; Zouaidi C; Wilson MA
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):585-99. PubMed ID: 26019005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: implications for orthographic processing.
Hsiao JH; Shillcock R
J Psycholinguist Res; 2006 Sep; 35(5):405-26. PubMed ID: 16897357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision.
Chang YN; Lee CY
Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 32789580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words.
Tse CS; Chan YL; Yap MJ; Tsang HC
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4382-4402. PubMed ID: 36443581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.
Sze WP; Yap MJ; Rickard Liow SJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1541-70. PubMed ID: 25622522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: orthographic and phonological activations.
Li QL; Bi HY; Wei TQ; Chen BG
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 20970102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chinese character handwriting: A large-scale behavioral study and a database.
Wang R; Huang S; Zhou Y; Cai ZG
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 30805862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing lexical ambiguity of simplified Chinese characters: Plurality and relatedness of character meanings.
Chen H; Xu X; Wang T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Apr; 77(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 37198743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
Marelli M; Amenta S
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: an event-related potential study.
Hsu CH; Tsai JL; Lee CY; Tzeng OJ
Brain Lang; 2009 Jan; 108(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 18951624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese.
Gao XY; Li MF; Chou TL; Wu JT
J Vis Exp; 2016 Apr; (110):e53815. PubMed ID: 27077703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and visual word recognition.
Bonin P; Méot A; Ferrand L; Bugaïska A
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):813-25. PubMed ID: 24993636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semantic ambiguity effects on traditional Chinese character naming: A corpus-based approach.
Chang YN; Lee CY
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2292-2304. PubMed ID: 29124717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Norms of conceptual familiarity for 3,596 French nouns and their contribution in lexical decision.
Chedid G; Wilson MA; Bedetti C; Rey AE; Vallet GT; Brambati SM
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2238-2247. PubMed ID: 30128888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways?
Bonin P; Méot A; Lagarrigue A; Roux S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1268-94. PubMed ID: 25338284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words.
Tse CS; Yap MJ; Chan YL; Sze WP; Shaoul C; Lin D
Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1503-1519. PubMed ID: 27734329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
