These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25631484)

  • 21. Which ratio of areas improves vision quality in simultaneous focus optics?
    Rio D; Legras R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 25785539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R; Rio D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of Degraded Optics on Monocular and Binocular Vision: Lessons from Recent Advances in Highly-Aberrated Eyes.
    Devi P; Kumar P; Marella BL; Bharadwaj SR
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2022; 37(7-8):869-886. PubMed ID: 35786147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal dynamics of ocular aberrations: monocular vs binocular vision.
    Mira-Agudelo A; Lundström L; Artal P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 May; 29(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 19422556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optical quality of the eye after lens replacement with a pseudoaccommodating intraocular lens.
    Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T; Charman WN; Cerviño A; Alfonso JF; Fernández-Vega L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 18471630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The influence of ocular dominance on monovision--the interaction between binocular visual functions and the state of dominant eye's correction].
    Nitta M; Shimizu K; Niida T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jun; 111(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 17601055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interocular amplitude differences of multifocal electroretinograms obtained under monocular and binocular stimulation conditions.
    Pálffy A; Janáky M; Fejes I; Horváth G; Benedek G
    Acta Physiol Hung; 2010 Sep; 97(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 20843771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between induced spherical aberration and depth of focus after hyperopic LASIK in presbyopic patients.
    Leray B; Cassagne M; Soler V; Villegas EA; Triozon C; Perez GM; Letsch J; Chapotot E; Artal P; Malecaze F
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Feb; 122(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 25444348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity.
    Villegas EA; Alcón E; Artal P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 49(10):4688-96. PubMed ID: 18552387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monocular and binocular development in children with albinism, infantile nystagmus syndrome, and normal vision.
    Huurneman B; Boonstra FN
    Strabismus; 2013 Dec; 21(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 24195763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Corneal Transplantation in Disease Affecting Only One Eye: Does It Make a Difference to Habitual Binocular Viewing?
    Bandela PK; Satgunam P; Garg P; Bharadwaj SR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150118. PubMed ID: 26938450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
    Fernandes PR; Neves HI; Lopes-Ferreira DP; Jorge JM; González-Meijome JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Subjective Refraction under Binocular and Monocular Conditions in Myopic Subjects.
    Kobashi H; Kamiya K; Handa T; Ando W; Kawamorita T; Igarashi A; Shimizu K
    Sci Rep; 2015 Jul; 5():12606. PubMed ID: 26218972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Potential use of cubic phase masks for extending the range of clear vision in presbyopes: initial calculation and simulation studies.
    Arines J; Almaguer C; Acosta E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):141-150. PubMed ID: 28105741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of pupil transmission apodization on presbyopic through-focus visual performance with spherical aberration.
    Zheleznyak L; Jung H; Yoon G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 24265022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of selected variables on monocular, interocular, and binocular visual acuity.
    Pointer JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Feb; 85(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 18296931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Presbyopia compensation: looking for cortical predictors.
    Imbeau L; Majzoub S; Thillay A; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Pisella PJ; Batty M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 101(2):223-226. PubMed ID: 27107029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses.
    García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Montés-Micó R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 22957771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. D(max) for stereoscopic depth perception with simulated monovision correction.
    Qian J; Adeseye SA; Stevenson SB; Patel SS; Bedell HE
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(5):399-408. PubMed ID: 21774871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.