165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25633022)
1. Imaging of adverse reactions to metal debris.
Maloney E; Ha AS; Miller TT
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2015 Feb; 19(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 25633022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Hip Society: algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management of metal-on-metal arthroplasty.
Lombardi AV; Barrack RL; Berend KR; Cuckler JM; Jacobs JJ; Mont MA; Schmalzried TP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):14-8. PubMed ID: 23118373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-sectional imaging in evaluation of soft tissue reactions secondary to metal debris.
Kwon YM
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Apr; 29(4):653-6. PubMed ID: 24655608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Ultrasound As Useful As Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Longitudinal Surveillance of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients?
Kwon YM; Dimitriou D; Liow MH; Tsai TY; Li G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1821-7. PubMed ID: 26895821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse reaction to metal debris after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Junnila M; Seppänen M; Mokka J; Virolainen P; Pölönen T; Vahlberg T; Mattila K; Tuominen EK; Rantakokko J; Äärimaa V; Itälä A; Mäkelä KT
Acta Orthop; 2015 Jun; 86(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 25582189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Best Practices: Best Imaging Modality for Surveillance of Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Petscavage-Thomas JM; Ha A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):311-317. PubMed ID: 33325734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in symptomatic versus asymptomatic subjects following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Nawabi DH; Hayter CL; Su EP; Koff MF; Perino G; Gold SL; Koch KM; Potter HG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 May; 95(10):895-902. PubMed ID: 23677356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Current literature and imaging techniques of aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL).
Duggan PJ; Burke CJ; Saha S; Moonim M; George M; Desai A; Houghton R
Clin Radiol; 2013 Nov; 68(11):1089-96. PubMed ID: 23932675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris.
Matharu GS; Berryman F; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB; Dunlop DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):617-26. PubMed ID: 27098320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Patient Evaluation and Treatment.
Bolognesi MP; Ledford CK
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2015 Dec; 23(12):724-31. PubMed ID: 26493972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similar incidence of periprosthetic fluid collections after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties and metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties: results of a screening metal artefact reduction sequence-MRI study.
Bisseling P; de Wit BW; Hol AM; van Gorp MJ; van Kampen A; van Susante JL
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 26330582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Adverse reactions of metal/metal hip prostheses - diagnosis and examination].
Fary C; Thomas GE; Taylor A; Beard D; Carr A; Glyn-Jones S
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2012 Apr; 101(9):593-9. PubMed ID: 22535455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The utility of repeat ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients.
Matharu GS; Janardhan S; Brash L; Pynsent PB; Dunlop DJ; James SL
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2016 Feb; 98(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 26741659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is appropriate surveillance for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients?
Matharu GS; Judge A; Eskelinen A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
Acta Orthop; 2018 Feb; 89(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 29105547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current concepts in hip arthroplasty imaging: metal-on-metal prostheses, their complications, and imaging strategies.
Bestic JM; Berquist TH
Semin Roentgenol; 2013 Apr; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 23452465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A longitudinal study of MARS MRI scanning of soft-tissue lesions around metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties and disease progression.
Briant-Evans TW; Lyle N; Barbur S; Hauptfleisch J; Amess R; Pearce AR; Conn KS; Stranks GJ; Britton JM
Bone Joint J; 2015 Oct; 97-B(10):1328-37. PubMed ID: 26430006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging of complications unrelated to metal wear.
Burge AJ
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2015 Feb; 19(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 25633023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Low-Carbon Metal-on-Metal Articulations for Hip Arthroplasties--Evaluation of Wear and Histology after 11 to 17 Years].
Reinisch G; Huber M; Zweymüller KA
Z Orthop Unfall; 2015 Aug; 153(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 25993351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metal-on-metal hip replacement: a new concept for an old problem?
Segal O; Maoz-Segal R
Isr Med Assoc J; 2013 Nov; 15(11):722-4. PubMed ID: 24511659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: going, going, gone... - affirms.
Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11 Suppl A):75-7. PubMed ID: 23118387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
