BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25633579)

  • 1. Environmental sound training in cochlear implant users.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Kuvadia S; Gygi B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):509-19. PubMed ID: 25633579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.
    Shafiro V; Gygi B; Cheng MY; Vachhani J; Mulvey M
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):511-23. PubMed ID: 21248643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of environmental sound training on the perception of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Gygi B; Ho KT
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):83-101. PubMed ID: 22891070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of nonlinguistic sounds.
    Inverso Y; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 20588119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training of Speech Perception in Noise in Pre-Lingual Hearing Impaired Adults With Cochlear Implants Compared With Normal Hearing Adults.
    Bugannim Y; Roth DA; Zechoval D; Kishon-Rabin L
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):e316-e325. PubMed ID: 30741913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward a Nonspeech Test of Auditory Cognition: Semantic Context Effects in Environmental Sound Identification in Adults of Varying Age and Hearing Abilities.
    Shafiro V; Sheft S; Norris M; Spanos G; Radasevich K; Formsma P; Gygi B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167030. PubMed ID: 27893791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech perception with F0mod, a cochlear implant pitch coding strategy.
    Francart T; Osses A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 25697275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech performance and training effects in the cochlear implant elderly.
    Schumann A; Hast A; Hoppe U
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19 Suppl 1():45-48. PubMed ID: 25733367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development.
    Gfeller K; Guthe E; Driscoll V; Brown CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3(0 3):S22-31. PubMed ID: 26561884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental sound perception of cochlear implant users.
    Looi V; Arnephy J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Dec; 11(4):203-27. PubMed ID: 19882594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
    Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What to Do When Cochlear Implant Users Plateau in Performance: a Pilot Study of Clinician-guided Aural Rehabilitation.
    Moberly AC; Vasil K; Baxter J; Ray C
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):e794-e802. PubMed ID: 30199497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1126-39. PubMed ID: 18247913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study.
    Hutter E; Argstatter H; Grapp M; Plinkert PK
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S13-21. PubMed ID: 26047068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.