These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25634287)

  • 1. Cytoplasmic transfer methods for studying the segregation of mitochondrial DNA in mice.
    Kolbe T; Steinborn R; Burgstaller JP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1265():357-65. PubMed ID: 25634287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytoplasmic Transfer Methods for Studying the Segregation of Mitochondrial DNA in Mice.
    Kolbe T; Steinborn R; Burgstaller JP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2277():91-99. PubMed ID: 34080146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A systematic analysis of the suitability of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for mitochondrial diseases in a heteroplasmic mitochondrial mouse model.
    Neupane J; Vandewoestyne M; Heindryckx B; Ghimire S; Lu Y; Qian C; Lierman S; Van Coster R; Gerris J; Deroo T; Deforce D; De Sutter P
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):852-9. PubMed ID: 24524987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reduction of mitochondrial DNA molecules during embryogenesis explains the rapid segregation of genotypes.
    Cree LM; Samuels DC; de Sousa Lopes SC; Rajasimha HK; Wonnapinij P; Mann JR; Dahl HH; Chinnery PF
    Nat Genet; 2008 Feb; 40(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 18223651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in ovine fetuses and sheep cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer.
    Burgstaller JP; Schinogl P; Dinnyes A; Müller M; Steinborn R
    BMC Dev Biol; 2007 Dec; 7():141. PubMed ID: 18154666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transmission of mitochondrial DNA in pigs and progeny derived from nuclear transfer of Meishan pig fibroblast cells.
    Takeda K; Tasai M; Iwamoto M; Akita T; Tagami T; Nirasawa K; Hanada H; Onishi A
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2006 Mar; 73(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 16245357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-balanced mix of mitochondrial DNA in cloned cattle produced by cytoplast-blastomere fusion.
    Steinborn R; Zakhartchenko V; Wolf E; Müller M; Brem G
    FEBS Lett; 1998 Apr; 426(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 9600266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mitochondrial DNA transmission and transcription after somatic cell fusion to one or more cytoplasts.
    Bowles EJ; Tecirlioglu RT; French AJ; Holland MK; St John JC
    Stem Cells; 2008 Mar; 26(3):775-82. PubMed ID: 18192233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishment of a heteroplasmic mouse strain with interspecific mitochondrial DNA haplotypes and improvement of a PCR-RFLP-based measurement system for estimation of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy.
    Shitara H; Cao L; Yamaguchi M; Yonekawa H; Taya C
    Transgenic Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 28220277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transmission of mitochondrial DNA following assisted reproduction and nuclear transfer.
    Spikings EC; Alderson J; St John JC
    Hum Reprod Update; 2006; 12(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 16581809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transmitochondrial differences and varying levels of heteroplasmy in nuclear transfer cloned cattle.
    Hiendleder S; Schmutz SM; Erhardt G; Green RD; Plante Y
    Mol Reprod Dev; 1999 Sep; 54(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 10423294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mitochondrial DNA segregation in hematopoietic lineages does not depend on MHC presentation of mitochondrially encoded peptides.
    Battersby BJ; Redpath ME; Shoubridge EA
    Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Sep; 14(17):2587-94. PubMed ID: 16049030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matching Mitochondrial DNA Haplotypes for Circumventing Tissue-Specific Segregation Bias.
    Pan J; Wang L; Lu C; Zhu Y; Min Z; Dong X; Sha H
    iScience; 2019 Mar; 13():371-379. PubMed ID: 30897510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of bovine-ovine interspecies cloned embryos and mitochondria segregation in blastomeres during preimplantation.
    Hua S; Zhang Y; Song K; Song J; Zhang Z; Zhang L; Zhang C; Cao J; Ma L
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2008 May; 105(3-4):245-57. PubMed ID: 17399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The mitochondrial genome in embryo technologies.
    Hiendleder S; Wolf E
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2003 Aug; 38(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 12887568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neutral mitochondrial heteroplasmy alters physiological function in mice.
    Acton BM; Lai I; Shang X; Jurisicova A; Casper RF
    Biol Reprod; 2007 Sep; 77(3):569-76. PubMed ID: 17554081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pronounced segregation of donor mitochondria introduced by bovine ooplasmic transfer to the female germ-line.
    Ferreira CR; Burgstaller JP; Perecin F; Garcia JM; Chiaratti MR; Méo SC; Müller M; Smith LC; Meirelles FV; Steinborn R
    Biol Reprod; 2010 Mar; 82(3):563-71. PubMed ID: 19955333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Distribution of foreign mitochondrial DNA during the first splittings of the transmitochondrial mouse embryos].
    Kustova ME; Sokolova VA; Bass MG; Zakharova FM; Sorokin AV; Vasil'ev VB
    Tsitologiia; 2008; 50(11):983-7. PubMed ID: 19140345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short- and long-term skin graft survival in cattle clones with different mitochondrial haplotypes.
    Theoret CL; Doré M; Mulon PY; Desrochers A; Viramontes F; Filion F; Smith LC
    Theriogenology; 2006 May; 65(8):1465-79. PubMed ID: 16214210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replicative advantage and tissue-specific segregation of RR mitochondrial DNA between C57BL/6 and RR heteroplasmic mice.
    Takeda K; Takahashi S; Onishi A; Hanada H; Imai H
    Genetics; 2000 Jun; 155(2):777-83. PubMed ID: 10835398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.