BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25634773)

  • 1. Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants.
    Kalathottukaren RT; Purdy SC; Ballard E
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):444-52. PubMed ID: 25634773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosody Perception and Production in Children with Hearing Loss and Age- and Gender-Matched Controls.
    Kalathottukaren RT; Purdy SC; Ballard E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):283-294. PubMed ID: 28418324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of Music Training for Perception of Emotional Speech Prosody in Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Good A; Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Nespoli G; Hopyan T; Peretz I; Russo FA
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):455-464. PubMed ID: 28085739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experiments on prosody perception with cochlear implants].
    Meister H; Tepeli D; Wagner P; Hess W; Walger M; von Wedel H; Lang-Roth R
    HNO; 2007 Apr; 55(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 17004071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of Auditory-Motor Musical Training on Melodic Pattern Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Chari DA; Barrett KC; Patel AD; Colgrove TR; Jiradejvong P; Jacobs LY; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Apr; 41(4):e422-e431. PubMed ID: 32176126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in the perception of melodic contours and pitch-accent timing in speech: Support for domain-generality of pitch processing.
    Morrill TH; McAuley JD; Dilley LC; Hambrick DZ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Aug; 144(4):730-6. PubMed ID: 26214165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of various electrode configurations on music perception, intonation and speaker gender identification.
    Landwehr M; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 23684531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Music and speech prosody: a common rhythm.
    Hausen M; Torppa R; Salmela VR; Vainio M; Särkämö T
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():566. PubMed ID: 24032022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying tone deafness in the general population.
    Sloboda JA; Wise KJ; Peretz I
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():255-61. PubMed ID: 16597772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fine-grained pitch processing of music and speech in congenital amusia.
    Tillmann B; Rusconi E; Traube C; Butterworth B; Umiltà C; Peretz I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4089-96. PubMed ID: 22225063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Leal MC; Shin YJ; Laborde ML; Calmels MN; Verges S; Lugardon S; Andrieu S; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Sep; 123(7):826-35. PubMed ID: 14575398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
    Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From TEMPO+ to OPUS 2: what can music tests tell us about processor upgrades?
    van Besouw RM; Grasmeder ML
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S40-3. PubMed ID: 21917218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.