BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25634773)

  • 21. Preserved appreciation of aesthetic elements of speech and music prosody in an amusic individual: A holistic approach.
    Loutrari A; Lorch MP
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Jul; 115():1-11. PubMed ID: 28371645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impaired perception of harmonic complexity in congenital amusia: a case study.
    Reed CL; Cahn SJ; Cory C; Szaflarski JP
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2011 Jul; 28(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 22248246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Towards an understanding of speech and song perception.
    van Besouw RM; Howard DM; Ternström S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(3-4):129-35. PubMed ID: 16287653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech.
    Heeren W; Coene M; Vaerenberg B; Avram A; Cardinaletti A; del Bo L; Pascu A; Volpato F; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Nov; 13(4):206-19. PubMed ID: 22449360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Meta-analytic evidence for the non-modularity of pitch processing in congenital amusia.
    Vuvan DT; Nunes-Silva M; Peretz I
    Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():186-200. PubMed ID: 26079675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Discrimination of musical pitch with cochlear implants].
    Haumann S; Mühler R; Ziese M; von Specht H
    HNO; 2007 Aug; 55(8):613-9. PubMed ID: 17136415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.
    Nimmons GL; Kang RS; Drennan WR; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubenstien JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 18309572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reestablishing speech understanding through musical ear training after cochlear implantation: a study of the potential cortical plasticity in the brain.
    Petersen B; Mortensen MV; Gjedde A; Vuust P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1169():437-40. PubMed ID: 19673820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Chen JK; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Hsieh JC; Tung TH; Li LP
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e793-800. PubMed ID: 20211951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of cochlear implants on children's perception and production of speech prosody.
    Nakata T; Trehub SE; Kanda Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1307-14. PubMed ID: 22352504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1996; 43():27-40. PubMed ID: 9265842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Discrimination of prosody and music by normal children.
    Doherty CP; Fitzsimons M; Asenbauer B; Staunton H
    Eur J Neurol; 1999 Mar; 6(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 10053235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Melody and chord discrimination of cochlear implant users in different pitch ranges.
    Boeckmann-Barthel M; Ziese M; Rostalski D; Arens C; Verhey JL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14(5):246-51. PubMed ID: 23510720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users.
    Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of a pitch perception model to investigate the effect of stimulation field spread on the pitch ranking abilities of cochlear implant recipients.
    Erfanian Saeedi N; Blamey PJ; Burkitt AN; Grayden DB
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():129-37. PubMed ID: 25193552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A study on the normal values of musical sounds in cochlear implants test battery].
    Dong R; Wang S; Zhou Y; Qi B; Chen X; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 27(13):712-6. PubMed ID: 24073580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Musical training software for children with cochlear implants.
    Di Nardo W; Schinaia L; Anzivino R; De Corso E; Ciacciarelli A; Paludetti G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2015 Oct; 35(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 26824211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Melodic Contour Training and Its Effect on Speech in Noise, Consonant Discrimination, and Prosody Perception for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Lo CY; McMahon CM; Looi V; Thompson WF
    Behav Neurol; 2015; 2015():352869. PubMed ID: 26494944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.