These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25634880)

  • 1. Validation of a technique for estimating organ doses for kilovoltage cone-beam CT of the prostate using the PCXMC 2.0 patient dose calculator.
    Wood TJ; Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    J Radiol Prot; 2015 Mar; 35(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 25634880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
    Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fractionated changes in prostate cancer radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Huang TC; Chou KT; Yang SN; Chang CK; Liang JA; Zhang G
    Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 25683282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation of patient imaging doses with scanning parameters for linac-integrated kilovoltage cone beam CT.
    Liao X; Wang Y; Lang J; Wang P; Li J; Ge R; Yang J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1659-67. PubMed ID: 26405932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testicular doses in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
    Deng J; Chen Z; Yu JB; Roberts KB; Peschel RE; Nath R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jan; 82(1):e39-47. PubMed ID: 21489702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive evaluations of cone-beam CT dose in image-guided radiation therapy via GPU-based Monte Carlo simulations.
    Montanari D; Scolari E; Silvestri C; Graves YJ; Yan H; Cervino L; Rice R; Jiang SB; Jia X
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(5):1239-53. PubMed ID: 24556699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of patient dose reduction based on various noise suppression filters for cone-beam computed tomography in an image-guided patient positioning system.
    Kamezawa H; Arimura H; Shirieda K; Kameda N; Ohki M
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(9):3609-36. PubMed ID: 27065312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
    Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of full/half bowtie filter models in a commercial treatment planning system for kilovoltage cone-beam CT dose estimations.
    Kim S; Alaei P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):153-164. PubMed ID: 27074480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental evaluation of actual delivered dose using mega-voltage cone-beam CT and direct point dose measurement.
    Matsubara K; Kohno R; Nishioka S; Shibuya T; Ariji T; Akimoto T; Saitoh H
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23266165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Localization of a portion of an endorectal balloon for prostate image-guided radiation therapy using cone-beam tomosynthesis: a feasibility study.
    Ng SK; Zygmanski P; Lyatskaya Y; D'Amico AV; Cormack RA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):e257-64. PubMed ID: 22401925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography dose and the necessity of reoptimization for imaging dose-integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Akino Y; Koizumi M; Sumida I; Takahashi Y; Ogata T; Ota S; Isohashi F; Konishi K; Yoshioka Y
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1715-22. PubMed ID: 21620584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging practices and radiation doses from imaging in radiotherapy.
    Siiskonen T; Kaijaluoto S; Florea T
    Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():247-252. PubMed ID: 28351527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using CBCT for pretreatment range check in proton therapy: a phantom study for prostate treatment by anterior-posterior beam.
    Bentefour el H; Both S; Tang S; Lu HM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):472–483. PubMed ID: 26699545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Koyama S; Aoyama T; Oda N; Yamauchi-Kawaura C
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4298-306. PubMed ID: 20879590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Organ and effective doses from verification techniques in image-guided radiotherapy.
    Dufek V; Horakova I; Novak L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):277-80. PubMed ID: 21816726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose calculation and treatment plan optimization including imaging dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography.
    Alaei P; Spezi E; Reynolds M
    Acta Oncol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):839-44. PubMed ID: 24438661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study on planning organ at risk volume for the rectum using cone beam computed tomography in the treatment of prostate cancer.
    Prabhakar R; Oates R; Jones D; Kron T; Cramb J; Foroudi F; Geso M; Gill S
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24412028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Monte Carlo study of organ and effective doses of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in radiotherapy.
    Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ; Sankaralingam M
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28952463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inclusion of the dose from kilovoltage cone beam CT in the radiation therapy treatment plans.
    Alaei P; Ding G; Guan H
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):244-8. PubMed ID: 20175487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.