482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25635324)
1. Deep neural nets as a method for quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Ma J; Sheridan RP; Liaw A; Dahl GE; Svetnik V
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 25635324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Demystifying Multitask Deep Neural Networks for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.
Xu Y; Ma J; Liaw A; Sheridan RP; Svetnik V
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Oct; 57(10):2490-2504. PubMed ID: 28872869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Support vector machine based training of multilayer feedforward neural networks as optimized by particle swarm algorithm: application in QSAR studies of bioactivity of organic compounds.
Lin WQ; Jiang JH; Zhou YP; Wu HL; Shen GL; Yu RQ
J Comput Chem; 2007 Jan; 28(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 17186488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extreme Gradient Boosting as a Method for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.
Sheridan RP; Wang WM; Liaw A; Ma J; Gifford EM
J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2353-2360. PubMed ID: 27958738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissecting Machine-Learning Prediction of Molecular Activity: Is an Applicability Domain Needed for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models Based on Deep Neural Networks?
Liu R; Wang H; Glover KP; Feasel MG; Wallqvist A
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):117-126. PubMed ID: 30412667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the Influence of Simulated Experimental Errors on 12 Machine Learning Algorithms in Bioactivity Modeling Using 12 Diverse Data Sets.
Cortes-Ciriano I; Bender A; Malliavin TE
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1413-25. PubMed ID: 26038978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GXNOR-Net: Training deep neural networks with ternary weights and activations without full-precision memory under a unified discretization framework.
Deng L; Jiao P; Pei J; Wu Z; Li G
Neural Netw; 2018 Apr; 100():49-58. PubMed ID: 29471195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ADMET Evaluation in Drug Discovery. 18. Reliable Prediction of Chemical-Induced Urinary Tract Toxicity by Boosting Machine Learning Approaches.
Lei T; Sun H; Kang Y; Zhu F; Liu H; Zhou W; Wang Z; Li D; Li Y; Hou T
Mol Pharm; 2017 Nov; 14(11):3935-3953. PubMed ID: 29037046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of support vector machine (SVM) for prediction toxic activity of different data sets.
Zhao CY; Zhang HX; Zhang XY; Liu MC; Hu ZD; Fan BT
Toxicology; 2006 Jan; 217(2-3):105-19. PubMed ID: 16213080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of Deep and Shallow Neural Networks, the Universal Approximation Theorem, Activity Cliffs, and QSAR.
Winkler DA; Le TC
Mol Inform; 2017 Jan; 36(1-2):. PubMed ID: 27783464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relevance Vector Machines: Sparse Classification Methods for QSAR.
Burden FR; Winkler DA
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1529-34. PubMed ID: 26158341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Choosing feature selection and learning algorithms in QSAR.
Eklund M; Norinder U; Boyer S; Carlsson L
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):837-43. PubMed ID: 24460242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep Artificial Neural Networks and Neuromorphic Chips for Big Data Analysis: Pharmaceutical and Bioinformatics Applications.
Pastur-Romay LA; Cedrón F; Pazos A; Porto-Pazos AB
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Aug; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 27529225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Molecular Similarity-Based Domain Applicability Metric Efficiently Identifies Out-of-Domain Compounds.
Liu R; Wallqvist A
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):181-189. PubMed ID: 30404432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine Learning Methods in Computational Toxicology.
Baskin II
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():119-139. PubMed ID: 29934890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Multiple Linear Regressions and Neural Networks based QSAR models for the design of new antitubercular compounds.
Ventura C; Latino DA; Martins F
Eur J Med Chem; 2013; 70():831-45. PubMed ID: 24246731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of different sampling methods in improving biological activity prediction using deep belief network.
Ghasemi F; Fassihi A; Pérez-Sánchez H; Mehri Dehnavi A
J Comput Chem; 2017 Feb; 38(4):195-203. PubMed ID: 27862046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critically Assessing the Predictive Power of QSAR Models for Human Liver Microsomal Stability.
Liu R; Schyman P; Wallqvist A
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1566-75. PubMed ID: 26170251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep-learning: investigating deep neural networks hyper-parameters and comparison of performance to shallow methods for modeling bioactivity data.
Koutsoukas A; Monaghan KJ; Li X; Huan J
J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):42. PubMed ID: 29086090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A natural language processing approach based on embedding deep learning from heterogeneous compounds for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling.
Bouhedjar K; Boukelia A; Khorief Nacereddine A; Boucheham A; Belaidi A; Djerourou A
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2020 Sep; 96(3):961-972. PubMed ID: 33058460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
