These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25635634)

  • 1. Minimally invasive spinal surgery and spinal stenosis.
    Arnold PM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 25635634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. X-Stop Resulted in a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Minimally Invasive Decompression, But Both Decreased Symptoms of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Huddleston P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(22):1889. PubMed ID: 26582619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Point of view.
    Lurie JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):86. PubMed ID: 25569525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Moojen WA; Peul WC
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1664. PubMed ID: 25832624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
    Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive versus open laminotomy.
    Tan LA; Kasliwal MK; Fessler RG
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):1081-2. PubMed ID: 24851736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].
    Korge A; Mehren C; Ruetten S
    Orthopade; 2019 Oct; 48(10):824-830. PubMed ID: 31053867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive Approaches for Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Hussain I; Kirnaz S; Wibawa G; Wipplinger C; Härtl R
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2019 Jul; 30(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 31078231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Point of view: Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Sengupta DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):450. PubMed ID: 16481956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
    Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laminarthrectomy.
    Gunzburg R
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1993-4. PubMed ID: 19936802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Moojen WA; Van der Gaag NA
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):681-4. PubMed ID: 27659170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.
    Watanabe K; Matsumoto M; Ikegami T; Nishiwaki Y; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Ogawa Y; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21142464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term Results of Microendoscopic Muscle-preserving Interlaminar Decompression versus Spinal Process Splitting Laminectomy.
    Fukushi R; Yoshimoto M; Iesato N; Terashima Y; Takebayashi T; Yamashita T
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 79(6):511-517. PubMed ID: 29294509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.