These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of culture in research misconduct. Davis MS Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers' reflections on reporting misconduct. Satalkar P; Shaw D Account Res; 2018; 25(6):311-339. PubMed ID: 29954230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recognition could support a science code of conduct. Ropert-Coudert Y Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):259. PubMed ID: 17507959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Publish or perish in China. Qiu J Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity. Adams D; Pimple KD Account Res; 2005; 12(3):225-40. PubMed ID: 16634173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study. Shaw D; Satalkar P Account Res; 2018; 25(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 29291621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity. Davies SR Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1235-1253. PubMed ID: 30251235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts. Khanyile TD; Duma S; Fakude LP; Mbombo N; Daniels F; Sabone MS Curationis; 2006 Mar; 29(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16817491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right. Sijtsma K Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 25820980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China. Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics and fraud in science: a review of scientific misconduct and applications to craniofacial research. Eliades T; Athanasiou AE; Papadopulos JS World J Orthod; 2005; 6(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 16164106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The road to fraud starts with a single step. Crocker J Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7372):151. PubMed ID: 22071724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community. Buljan I; Barać L; Marušić A Account Res; 2018; 25(4):220-238. PubMed ID: 29637796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. Horner J; Minifie FD J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):S346-62. PubMed ID: 21081675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]