206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25636557)
1. Evaluation of stress changes in the mandible with a fixed functional appliance: a finite element study.
Chaudhry A; Sidhu MS; Chaudhary G; Grover S; Chaudhry N; Kaushik A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 25636557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of mandibular angle ostectomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Song J; Zhu S; Luo E; Hu J; Feng G
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):e375-8. PubMed ID: 25006954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tooth displacement in shortened dental arches: a three-dimensional finite element study.
De Oliveira BF; Seraidarian PI; de Oliveira SG; Landre J; Pithon MM; Oliveira DD
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 24461945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress distribution in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular protraction: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Part 2.
Gupta A; Hazarey PV; Kharbanda OP; Kohli VS; Gunjal A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):749-56. PubMed ID: 19524834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of the closing and opening muscle groups on jaw condyle biomechanics after prominent mandibular angle osteotomy.
Ma L; Qi X; Qin J; Zhong S; Zhang B; Zhang Y; Xia H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 41(5):408-11. PubMed ID: 23218504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis of stresses in the maxillary and mandibular dental arches and TMJ articular discs during clenching into maximum intercuspation, anterior and unilateral posterior occlusion.
Pileicikiene G; Surna A; Barauskas R; Surna R; Basevicius A
Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):121-8. PubMed ID: 18303277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the lower third molar presence and position on the fragility of mandibular angle and condyle: A Three-dimensional finite element study.
Antic S; Vukicevic AM; Milasinovic M; Saveljic I; Jovicic G; Filipovic N; Rakocevic Z; Djuric M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 43(6):870-8. PubMed ID: 25939313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis comparing natural and alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement using a finite element model.
Mesnard M; Ramos A; Ballu A; Morlier J; Cid M; Simoes JA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1008-17. PubMed ID: 20674129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative finite element analysis of the biomechanical stability of 2.0 fixation plates in atrophic mandibular fractures.
Vajgel A; Camargo IB; Willmersdorf RB; de Melo TM; Laureano Filho JR; Vasconcellos RJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 23351762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite-element analysis of 3 situations of trauma in the human edentulous mandible.
Santos LS; Rossi AC; Freire AR; Matoso RI; Caria PH; Prado FB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 25577458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Validating a loading protocol for weakened mandibular models].
Yachouh J; Frison L; Goudot P
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2010 Jun; 111(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 20347462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of maxillary protraction with labiolingual arches and implants.
Liu C; Zhu X; Zhang X
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):466-78. PubMed ID: 26321345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical effects of fixed functional appliance on craniofacial structures.
Panigrahi P; Vineeth V
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jul; 79(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 19537856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Condylar response to functional therapy with Twin-Block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography.
Yildirim E; Karacay S; Erkan M
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1018-25. PubMed ID: 24713070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Class II activator and Class II activator high-pull headgear combination on the mandible: a 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis study.
Ulusoy C; Darendeliler N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):490.e9-15. PubMed ID: 18405811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The influences of the stress distribution on the condylar cartilage surface by Herbst appliance under various bite reconstruction--a three dimensional finite element analysis].
Hu L; Zhao Z; Song J; Fan Y; Jiang W; Chen J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Feb; 19(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 12539638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of a curvilinear distractor device for correcting mandibular symphyseal defects.
Zhao L; Shang H; Chen X; Liu Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1158-67. PubMed ID: 24388177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis of the human mandible to assess the effect of removing an impacted third molar.
Szucs A; Bujtár P; Sándor GK; Barabás J
J Can Dent Assoc; 2010; 76():a72. PubMed ID: 20579440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
