104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25636562)
1. Admissibility of scientific evidence.
Jerrold L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):270-1. PubMed ID: 25636562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
Flanagan D
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forensic dentistry. Civil litigation and the narrative report.
Chrz B
J Okla Dent Assoc; 1997; 88(2):31, 42, 54. PubMed ID: 9540705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Forensic Dentist: An Overview of Expert Roles in Animal Bite-Mark Investigations.
Cohrn K; Berman R
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Jun; 43(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 26126348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for expert testimony in implant dentistry.
Flanagan D
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 12498454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The judicial view of bitemarks within the United States Criminal Justice System.
Pretty IA; Sweet DJ
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16783949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The merits of the paternalistic justification for restrictions on the admissibility of expert evidence.
Sanders J
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(4):881-941. PubMed ID: 14626262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of a forensic pseudoscience: Identification of criminals from bitemark patterns.
Bowers CM
J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Feb; 61():34-39. PubMed ID: 30447642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic dentistry: Far beyond Netflix.
Fonseca GM
J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Aug; 74():102032. PubMed ID: 33012315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
Klee CH; Friedman HJ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Odontology as a forensic science, the North American experience.
Barsley RE
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):5-7. PubMed ID: 20304574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Jurisprudence issues in forensic odontology.
Bowers CM
Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):399-415, ix. PubMed ID: 11370461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The truth about expert witnesses.
Byers MM
J Colo Dent Assoc; 2000; 79(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 11404934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Criteria of expert assessment of professional errors in dentistry].
Popova TG
Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(6):25-7. PubMed ID: 18159756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there any indication for ethics evidence? An argument for the admissibility of some expert bioethics testimony.
Nelson LJ
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):248-63. PubMed ID: 16083084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Expert assessment of professional errors in stomatology].
Popova TG
Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 18589675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
Giannelli PC
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
