321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25637372)
1. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.
Zhang D; Lv S; Song X; Yuan F; Xu F; Zhang M; Yan S; Cao X
Heart; 2015 Mar; 101(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 25637372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with small-vessel disease.
Puymirat E; Peace A; Mangiacapra F; Conte M; Ntarladimas Y; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wijns W; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 5(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 22319067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.
van Nunen LX; Zimmermann FM; Tonino PA; Barbato E; Baumbach A; Engstrøm T; Klauss V; MacCarthy PA; Manoharan G; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; Van't Veer M; Fearon WF; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH;
Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10006):1853-60. PubMed ID: 26333474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of age on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial substudy.
Lim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Lee BK; Pijls NH; Fearon WF
Int J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 177(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 25499342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve- versus angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate stenosis of coronary artery bypass grafts.
Di Serafino L; De Bruyne B; Mangiacapra F; Bartunek J; Agostoni P; Vanderheyden M; Scognamiglio G; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; Barbato E
Am Heart J; 2013 Jul; 166(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23816029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of sex differences on fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) substudy.
Kim HS; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yong AS; Tremmel JA; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1037-42. PubMed ID: 23078733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Zimmermann FM; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Desai M; Oldroyd KG; Park SJ; Reardon MJ; Wendler O; Woo J; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):619-626.e2. PubMed ID: 26386784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice.
Li J; Elrashidi MY; Flammer AJ; Lennon RJ; Bell MR; Holmes DR; Bresnahan JF; Rihal CS; Lerman LO; Lerman A
Eur Heart J; 2013 May; 34(18):1375-83. PubMed ID: 23344979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing treatment outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Xiu J; Chen G; Zheng H; Wang Y; Chen H; Liu X; Wu J; Bin J
Clin Invest Med; 2016 Feb; 39(1):E25-36. PubMed ID: 26833170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention results in reduced ischemic myocardium and improved outcomes.
Sawant AC; Bhardwaj A; Banerjee K; Jobanputra Y; Kumar A; Parikh P; Kandregula KC; Poddar K; Ellis SG; Nair R; Corbelli J; Kapadia S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):692-700. PubMed ID: 29405553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcome of FFR-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease in daily clinical practice: a propensity score-matched landmark analysis.
De Backer O; Biasco L; Lønborg J; Pedersen F; Holmvang L; Kelbaek H; Arnous S; Saunamäki K; Helqvist S; Kastrup J; Jørgensen E; Engstrøm T
EuroIntervention; 2016 Feb; 11(11):e1257-66. PubMed ID: 26865443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease.
De Bruyne B; Fearon WF; Pijls NH; Barbato E; Tonino P; Piroth Z; Jagic N; Mobius-Winckler S; Rioufol G; Witt N; Kala P; MacCarthy P; Engström T; Oldroyd K; Mavromatis K; Manoharan G; Verlee P; Frobert O; Curzen N; Johnson JB; Limacher A; Nüesch E; Jüni P;
N Engl J Med; 2014 Sep; 371(13):1208-17. PubMed ID: 25176289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should fraction flow reserve be considered an important decision-making tool to stratify patients with stable coronary artery disease for percutaneous coronary intervention?: A meta-analysis.
Bundhun PK; Gupta C; Huang F
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Nov; 96(46):e8748. PubMed ID: 29145326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: Insights from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) trial.
Kobayashi Y; Tonino PA; De Bruyne B; Yang HM; Lim HS; Pijls NH; Fearon WF;
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 204():206-10. PubMed ID: 26670174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Toth G; De Bruyne B; Casselman F; De Vroey F; Pyxaras S; Di Serafino L; Van Praet F; Van Mieghem C; Stockman B; Wijns W; Degrieck I; Barbato E
Circulation; 2013 Sep; 128(13):1405-11. PubMed ID: 23985788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes.
Kasula S; Agarwal SK; Hacioglu Y; Pothineni NK; Bhatti S; Ahmed Z; Uretsky B; Hakeem A
Heart; 2016 Dec; 102(24):1988-1994. PubMed ID: 27492942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
