BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25637468)

  • 1. Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of anterior decompression and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Kim B; Yoon DH; Shin HC; Kim KN; Yi S; Shin DA; Ha Y
    Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 25637468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: Advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty.
    Iwasaki M; Okuda S; Miyauchi A; Sakaura H; Mukai Y; Yonenobu K; Yoshikawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 17413470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of dynamic factors on surgical outcomes after double-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
    Maruo K; Moriyama T; Tachibana T; Inoue S; Arizumi F; Daimon T; Yoshiya S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):938-43. PubMed ID: 25279653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical results and complications of anterior decompression and fusion as a revision surgery after initial posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Odate S; Shikata J; Soeda T; Yamamura S; Kawaguchi S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):466-473. PubMed ID: 28128699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Koda M; Mochizuki M; Konishi H; Aiba A; Kadota R; Inada T; Kamiya K; Ota M; Maki S; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Mannoji C; Furuya T
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2294-301. PubMed ID: 27072553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.
    Qin R; Chen X; Zhou P; Li M; Hao J; Zhang F
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 29335903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty.
    Xu P; Zhuang JS; Huang YS; Tu C; Chen JT; Zhong ZM
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019837907. PubMed ID: 30894095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is anterior decompression and fusion superior to laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu P; Zhuang JS; Huang YS; Chen JT; Zhong ZM
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2021 Mar; 44(2):169-183. PubMed ID: 30888255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study.
    Yoshii T; Sakai K; Hirai T; Yamada T; Inose H; Kato T; Enomoto M; Tomizawa S; Kawabata S; Arai Y; Okawa A
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1351-1357. PubMed ID: 27498333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative complications of anterior cervical decompression with fusion in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a retrospective, multi-institutional study.
    Kimura A; Seichi A; Hoshino Y; Yamazaki M; Mochizuki M; Aiba A; Kato T; Uchida K; Miyamoto K; Nakahara S; Taniguchi S; Neo M; Taguchi T; Endo K; Watanabe M; Takahashi M; Kaito T; Chikuda H; Fujimori T; Ito T; Ono A; Abumi K; Yamada K; Nakagawa Y; Toyama Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Nov; 17(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 22878671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging.
    Yagi M; Ninomiya K; Kihara M; Horiuchi Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jan; 12(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 20043766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy Based on Features of Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review.
    Nakashima H; Tetreault L; Kato S; Kryshtalskyj MT; Nagoshi N; Nouri A; Singh A; Fehlings MG
    JBJS Rev; 2017 Feb; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 28248739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament combined with ossification of the ligamentum flavum-a retrospective study.
    Li M; Meng H; Du J; Tao H; Luo Z; Wang Z
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1093-102. PubMed ID: 23219457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing effects of cervical anterior approach and laminoplasty in surgical management of cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament by a prospective nonrandomized controlled study.
    Hou Y; Liang L; Shi GD; Xu P; Xu GH; Shi JG; Yuan W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 28619269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel anterior decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy) for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.
    Lee DH; Cho JH; Lee CS; Hwang CJ; Choi SH; Hong CG
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1099-1105. PubMed ID: 29496626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparative Study of Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Patients With Large Anterior Compression of the Spinal Cord.
    Hirai T; Yoshii T; Arai Y; Sakai K; Torigoe I; Maehara H; Tomori M; Taniyama T; Sato H; Okawa A
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1137-E1142. PubMed ID: 28099187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.
    Chen Y; Guo Y; Lu X; Chen D; Song D; Shi J; Yuan W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb; 24(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20924295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
    Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term results of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with an occupying ratio of 60% or more.
    Fujimori T; Iwasaki M; Okuda S; Takenaka S; Kashii M; Kaito T; Yoshikawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 24108293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty.
    Iwasaki M; Okuda S; Miyauchi A; Sakaura H; Mukai Y; Yonenobu K; Yoshikawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):647-53. PubMed ID: 17413469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 118.