566 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25637621)
1. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intracervical insemination versus intrauterine insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a randomized controlled trial.
Kop PAL; van Wely M; Nap A; Soufan AT; de Melker AA; Mol BWJ; Bernardus RE; De Brucker M; Janssens PMW; Pieters JJPM; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1175-1182. PubMed ID: 35459949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrauterine insemination versus intracervical insemination in donor sperm treatment.
Kop PA; Mochtar MH; O'Brien PA; Van der Veen F; van Wely M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD000317. PubMed ID: 29368795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2 days after the spontaneous LH rise? A prospective RCT.
Blockeel C; Knez J; Polyzos NP; De Vos M; Camus M; Tournaye H
Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 24549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.
Hurd WW; Randolph JF; Ansbacher R; Menge AC; Ohl DA; Brown AN
Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 8425628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one?
Chavkin DE; Molinaro TA; Roe AH; Sammel MD; Dokras A
J Androl; 2012; 33(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 21636733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study].
Westergaard LG
Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm.
Byrd W; Bradshaw K; Carr B; Edman C; Odom J; Ackerman G
Fertil Steril; 1990 Mar; 53(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 2307249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Donor IUI is equally effective for heterosexual couples, single women and lesbians, but autologous IUI does worse.
Soares SR; Cruz M; Vergara V; Requena A; García-Velasco JA
Hum Reprod; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2184-2192. PubMed ID: 31711203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.
Peeraer K; Debrock S; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Mol BW; Spiessens C; De Neubourg D; D'Hooghe TM
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1079-88. PubMed ID: 25788569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.
Wolf DP; Patton PE; Burry KA; Kaplan PF
Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 11438340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women.
Carroll N; Palmer JR
Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11287014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A short versus a long time interval between semen collection and intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Statema-Lohmeijer CH; Schats R; Lissenberg-Witte BI; Kostelijk EH; Lambalk CB; Vergouw CG
Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 36892580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.
Matorras R; Gorostiaga A; Diez J; Corcóstegui B; Pijoan JI; Ramón O; Rodriguez-Escudero FJ
Fertil Steril; 1996 Mar; 65(3):620-5. PubMed ID: 8774298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intrauterine insemination: is it an effective treatment for male factor infertility?
Ford WC; Mathur RS; Hull MG
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Dec; 11(4):691-710. PubMed ID: 9692011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-uterine versus cervical insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
O'Brien P; Vandekerckhove P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 10796709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective randomized comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with donor spermatozoa.
Wainer R; Merlet F; Ducot B; Bailly M; Tribalat S; Lombroso R
Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2919-22. PubMed ID: 8747045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
