155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25637749)
1. Evaluation of current copper bioavailability tools for soft freshwaters in Sweden.
Hoppe S; Gustafsson JP; Borg H; Breitholtz M
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Apr; 114():143-9. PubMed ID: 25637749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Multiple Linear Regression Models for Setting Water Quality Criteria for Copper: A Complementary Approach to the Biotic Ligand Model.
Brix KV; DeForest DK; Tear L; Grosell M; Adams WJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 May; 51(9):5182-5192. PubMed ID: 28409924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can natural levels of Al influence Cu speciation and toxicity to Daphnia magna in a Swedish soft water lake?
Hoppe S; Gustafsson JP; Borg H; Breitholtz M
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():205-10. PubMed ID: 26073589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal assessment of copper speciation, bioavailability and toxicity in UK freshwaters using chemical equilibrium and biotic ligand models: Implications for compliance with copper environmental quality standards.
Lathouri M; Korre A
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 538():385-401. PubMed ID: 26318223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Copper toxicity and the influence of water quality of Dongnai River and Mekong River waters on copper bioavailability and toxicity to three tropical species.
Bui TK; Do-Hong LC; Dao TS; Hoang TC
Chemosphere; 2016 Feb; 144():872-8. PubMed ID: 26421627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictions of Cu toxicity in three aquatic species using bioavailability tools in four Swedish soft freshwaters.
Hoppe S; Sundbom M; Borg H; Breitholtz M
Environ Sci Eur; 2015; 27(1):25. PubMed ID: 27752426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Derivation of acute copper biotic ligand model-based predicted no-effect concentrations and acute-chronic ratio.
Chung J; Hwang DS; Park DH; An YJ; Yeom DH; Park TJ; Choi J; Lee JH
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 780():146425. PubMed ID: 34030286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Demonstrating the Reliability of bio-met for Determining Compliance with Environmental Quality Standards for Metals in Europe.
Peters A; Nys C; Merrington G; Verdonck F; Baken S; Cooper CA; Van Assche F; Schlekat C; Garman E
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Dec; 39(12):2361-2377. PubMed ID: 32997832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential of the Biotic Ligand Model (BLM) to Predict Copper Toxicity in the White-Water of the Solimões-Amazon River.
Pont GD; Domingos FX; Fernandes-de-Castilho M; Val AL
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2017 Jan; 98(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27888328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a biotic ligand model on site-specific copper toxicity to Daphnia magna in the Yeongsan River, Korea.
Park J; Ra JS; Rho H; Cho J; Kim SD
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2018 Mar; 149():108-115. PubMed ID: 29154134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a Machine Learning Model to Estimate the Biotic Ligand Model-Based Predicted No-Effect Concentrations for Copper in Freshwater.
Chung J; Yoo G; Jo JS; Choi J; Lee JH
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2023 Oct; 42(10):2271-2283. PubMed ID: 37377350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refinement and cross-validation of nickel bioavailability in PNEC-Pro, a regulatory tool for site-specific risk assessment of metals in surface water.
Verschoor AJ; Vijver MG; Vink JPM
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Sep; 36(9):2367-2376. PubMed ID: 28224666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimentally derived acute and chronic copper Biotic Ligand Models for rainbow trout.
Crémazy A; Wood CM; Ng TY; Smith DS; Chowdhury MJ
Aquat Toxicol; 2017 Nov; 192():224-240. PubMed ID: 28987990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Generalized Bioavailability Model (gBAM) for Predicting Chronic Copper Toxicity to Freshwater Fish.
Nys C; Vlaeminck K; Van Sprang P; De Schamphelaere KAC
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Dec; 39(12):2424-2436. PubMed ID: 32573793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of an acute biotic ligand model to predict chronic copper toxicity to Daphnia magna in natural waters of Chile and reconstituted synthetic waters.
Villavicencio G; Urrestarazu P; Arbildua J; Rodriguez PH
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2011 Oct; 30(10):2319-25. PubMed ID: 21796669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between biotic ligand model-based water quality criteria and avoidance and olfactory responses to copper by fish.
Meyer JS; Adams WJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Sep; 29(9):2096-103. PubMed ID: 20821668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the capacity of two biotic ligand models to predict chronic copper toxicity to two Daphnia magna clones and formulation of a generalized bioavailability model.
Van Regenmortel T; Janssen CR; De Schamphelaere KA
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Jul; 34(7):1597-608. PubMed ID: 25771778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Biotic Ligand Model relative to other site-specific criteria derivation methods for copper in surface waters with elevated hardness.
Van Genderen E; Gensemer R; Smith C; Santore R; Ryan A
Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 17681387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the scientific underpinning of regulatory tools to estimate bioavailability of nickel in freshwaters matter? The European-wide environmental quality standard for nickel.
Peters A; Schlekat CE; Merrington G
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2397-2404. PubMed ID: 27253879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the biotic ligand model to predict pulse-exposure toxicity of copper to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas).
Meyer JS; Boese CJ; Morris JM
Aquat Toxicol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 17659358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
