BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25639685)

  • 1. Cold snare polypectomy: does snare type influence outcomes?
    Din S; Ball AJ; Riley SA; Kitsanta P; Johal S
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jul; 27(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 25639685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy versus a suction pseudopolyp technique.
    Din S; Ball AJ; Riley SA; Kitsanta P; Johal S
    Endoscopy; 2015 Nov; 47(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 26165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized clinical trial between cold snare polypectomy and hot forceps biopsy.
    Komeda Y; Kashida H; Sakurai T; Tribonias G; Okamoto K; Kono M; Yamada M; Adachi T; Mine H; Nagai T; Asakuma Y; Hagiwara S; Matsui S; Watanabe T; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 28127206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cold snare polypectomy: Indications, devices, techniques, outcomes and future.
    Horiuchi A; Ikuse T; Tanaka N
    Dig Endosc; 2019 Jul; 31(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 30549318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.
    Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 24125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polypectomy practices of sub-centimeter polyps in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
    Din S; Ball AJ; Taylor E; Rutter M; Riley SA; Johal S
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3224-30. PubMed ID: 25591413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective randomized comparison of cold snare polypectomy and conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.
    Ichise Y; Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Tanaka N
    Digestion; 2011; 84(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 21494037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can endoscopic submucosal dissection technique be an alternative treatment option for a difficult giant (≥ 30 mm) pedunculated colorectal polyp?
    Choi YS; Lee JB; Lee EJ; Lee SH; Suh JP; Lee DH; Kim DS; Youk EG
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 May; 56(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 23575407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histological outcomes between hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.
    Yamamoto T; Suzuki S; Kusano C; Yakabe K; Iwamoto M; Ikehara H; Gotoda T; Moriyama M
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2017; 23(4):246-252. PubMed ID: 28721979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.
    Li D; Wang W; Xie J; Liu G; Wang R; Jiang C; Ye Z; Xu B; He X; Hong D
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):362-370. PubMed ID: 32150478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cold Snare Polypectomy Technique: Technique Matters More Than Snare Wire Diameter.
    Sidhu M; Forbes N; Tate DJ; Desomer L; Lee EYT; Burgess N; van Hattem A; Mcleod D; Cheng E; Cartwright S; Schell A; Hilsden RJ; Heitman SJ; Bourke MJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2022 Jan; 117(1):100. PubMed ID: 34817440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: a prospective randomized study.
    Lee CK; Shim JJ; Jang JY
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 108(10):1593-600. PubMed ID: 24042189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective randomized comparative study of cold forceps polypectomy by using narrow-band imaging endoscopy versus cold snare polypectomy in patients with diminutive colorectal polyps.
    Park SK; Ko BM; Han JP; Hong SJ; Lee MS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):527-32.e1. PubMed ID: 26358331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BEST POLYPECTOMY TECHNIQUE FOR SMALL AND DIMINUTIVE COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.
    Tranquillini CV; Bernardo WM; Brunaldi VO; Moura ET; Marques SB; Moura EGH
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2018; 55(4):358-368. PubMed ID: 30785519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cold snare polypectomy versus hot snare polypectomy in endoscopic treatment of small polyps.
    Aslan F; Camcı M; Alper E; Akpınar Z; Arabul M; Celik M; Unsal B
    Turk J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 25(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 25141316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrieval of colorectal polyps following snare polypectomy: Experience of the multiple-suction technique in 602 cases.
    Ye F; Feng Y; Lin J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2008 Apr; 23(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 18185937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic snare excision of large pedunculated colorectal polyps: a new, safe, and effective technique.
    Brandimarte G; Tursi A
    Endoscopy; 2001 Oct; 33(10):854-7. PubMed ID: 11571681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cold polypectomy techniques for diminutive polyps in the colorectum.
    Uraoka T; Ramberan H; Matsuda T; Fujii T; Yahagi N
    Dig Endosc; 2014 Apr; 26 Suppl 2():98-103. PubMed ID: 24750157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Liu W; Gong J; Gu L
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 May; 38(1):136. PubMed ID: 37204495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.
    Horiuchi A; Hosoi K; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N; Sano K; Graham DY
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 25922251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.