172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25640048)
1. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits?
Liu X; Landon MB; Cheng W; Chen Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):817.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25640048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Secular trends of cesarean delivery and cesarean delivery on maternal request among primiparous women with singleton pregnancy in Southern and Northern China during 1993-2010].
Zhu YB; Li HT; Zhang YL; Li ZW; Zhang L; Liu JM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 92(25):1734-7. PubMed ID: 22944178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Birth outcomes following cesarean delivery on maternal request: a population-based cohort study.
Guo Y; Murphy MSQ; Erwin E; Fakhraei R; Corsi DJ; White RR; Harvey ALJ; Gaudet LM; Walker MC; Wen SW; El-Chaâr D
CMAJ; 2021 May; 193(18):E634-E644. PubMed ID: 33941522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China.
Deng R; Tang X; Liu J; Gao Y; Zhong X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):384. PubMed ID: 34011289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication?
Dursun P; Yanik FB; Zeyneloglu HB; Baser E; Kuscu E; Ayhan A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1133-7. PubMed ID: 21668323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor.
Subramaniam A; Jauk VC; Goss AR; Alvarez MD; Reese C; Edwards RK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):700.e1-9. PubMed ID: 24956550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term.
Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 16880297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal outcomes in fetuses with cardiac anomalies and the impact of delivery route.
Parikh LI; Grantz KL; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Landy HJ; Fries MH; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):469.e1-469.e12. PubMed ID: 28578168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pushing the bounds of second stage in term nulliparas with a predictive model.
Gimovsky AC; Levine JT; Pham A; Dunn J; Zhou D; Peaceman AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 Aug; 1(3):100028. PubMed ID: 33345792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with forceps delivery versus cesarean delivery.
Liu X; Landon MB; Cheng W; Chen Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jan; 33(2):307-313. PubMed ID: 29909749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prolonged and post-term pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Vayssière C; Haumonte JB; Chantry A; Coatleven F; Debord MP; Gomez C; Le Ray C; Lopez E; Salomon LJ; Senat MV; Sentilhes L; Serry A; Winer N; Grandjean H; Verspyck E; Subtil D;
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 23434325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population.
Bodner K; Wierrani F; Grünberger W; Bodner-Adler B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1193-8. PubMed ID: 20505947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want?
Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):252-60. PubMed ID: 22825082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term.
Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Liston RM; Baskett TF
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 102(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 12962927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?
Drassinower D; Timofeev J; Huang CC; Landy HJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):160.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24534184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome.
Richardson BS; Czikk MJ; daSilva O; Natale R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 15672028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term.
Wolfe H; Timofeev J; Tefera E; Desale S; Driggers RW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 211(1):53.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24486226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Placenta response of inflammation and oxidative stress in low-risk term childbirth: the implication of delivery mode.
Hu Y; Huang K; Sun Y; Wang J; Xu Y; Yan S; Zhu P; Tao F
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Dec; 17(1):407. PubMed ID: 29207957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
