These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2564016)
1. Methods for calculating the efficiency of bacterial surface sampling techniques. Whyte W; Carson W; Hambraeus A J Hosp Infect; 1989 Jan; 13(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 2564016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are bacterial counts on slit-skin smears in leprosy affected by preparing slides under field conditions? Rose ET Lepr Rev; 1988 Jun; 59(2):189. PubMed ID: 3073287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Standardization of control studies in determination of sensitivity of microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs by the disk-diffusion method based on domestic nutrition media]. Poliak MS; Azanchevskaia SV; Tsvetkova IA Klin Lab Diagn; 2004 Nov; (11):53-6. PubMed ID: 15646137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mathematical treatment of plates with colony counts outside the acceptable range. Blodgett RJ Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 17993381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Drinking water analysis for Legionella. Suggestions for sampling, laboratory analysis and assessment]. Schaefer B Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2007 Mar; 50(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 17334892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of direct colony count methods and the MPN-method for quantitative detection of Listeria in model and field conditions]. Hildebrandt G; Schott W Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001; 114(11-12):453-64. PubMed ID: 11766274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization. Moore G; Griffith C J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alternative microbial methods: An overview and selection criteria. Jasson V; Jacxsens L; Luning P; Rajkovic A; Uyttendaele M Food Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 27(6):710-30. PubMed ID: 20630313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Out of the test tube into the frying pan: post-growth, pre-test variables. Gilbert P; Brown MR J Antimicrob Chemother; 1991 Jun; 27(6):859-60. PubMed ID: 1938693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of microbiological quantitative methods for evaluation of changes in the amount of bacteria in patients with wounds and purulent fistulas subjected to phage therapy and for assessment of phage preparation effectiveness (in vitro studies). Lecion D; Fortuna W; Dąbrowska K; Międzybrodzki R; Weber-Dąbrowska B; Górski A Adv Med Sci; 2013; 58(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 24216162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Sampling plans in microbiological criteria for food and their "performance criteria"]. Dahms S; Hildebrandt G; Weiss H; Arndt G Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001; 114(11-12):465-9. PubMed ID: 11766275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of laboratory and biosafety practices associated with bacterial culture in veterinary clinics. Weese JS; Prescott JF J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2009 Feb; 234(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 19210256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infected pressure sores: comparison of methods for bacterial identification. Rudensky B; Lipschits M; Isaacsohn M; Sonnenblick M South Med J; 1992 Sep; 85(9):901-3. PubMed ID: 1523451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]