These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25640582)

  • 1. Electrochemical hematocrit determination in a direct current microfluidic device.
    Lee HY; Barber C; Rogers JA; Minerick AR
    Electrophoresis; 2015 Apr; 36(7-8):978-85. PubMed ID: 25640582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On-chip estimation of hematocrit level for diagnosing anemic conditions by Impedimetric techniques.
    Chakraborty S; Das S; Das C; Chandra S; Sharma KD; Karmakar A; Chattoapadhyay S
    Biomed Microdevices; 2020 May; 22(2):38. PubMed ID: 32430696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A justification for high resolution hematocrit measurement.
    Kelly ME; Luetkemeier MJ; Pantalos GM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 May; 26(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 8007800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the hematocrit using paper-based microfluidic devices.
    Berry SB; Fernandes SC; Rajaratnam A; DeChiara NS; Mace CR
    Lab Chip; 2016 Oct; 16(19):3689-94. PubMed ID: 27604182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Point-of-Care Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Testing: Comparison of Methodology and Technology.
    Maslow A; Bert A; Singh A; Sweeney J
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Apr; 30(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 27013121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hematocrit analysis through the use of an inexpensive centrifugal polyester-toner device with finger-to-chip blood loading capability.
    Thompson BL; Gilbert RJ; Mejia M; Shukla N; Haverstick DM; Garner GT; Landers JP
    Anal Chim Acta; 2016 Jun; 924():1-8. PubMed ID: 27181638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving electrokinetic microdevice stability by controlling electrolysis bubbles.
    Lee HY; Barber C; Minerick AR
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Jul; 35(12-13):1782-9. PubMed ID: 24648277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustofluidic hematocrit determination.
    Petersson K; Jakobsson O; Ohlsson P; Augustsson P; Scheding S; Malm J; Laurell T
    Anal Chim Acta; 2018 Feb; 1000():199-204. PubMed ID: 29289309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Platinum electrode modification: Unique surface carbonization approach to improve performance and sensitivity.
    Lee HY; Barber C; Minerick AR
    Electrophoresis; 2015 Aug; 36(15):1666-73. PubMed ID: 26032065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A lab-on-a-chip for rapid blood separation and quantification of hematocrit and serum analytes.
    Browne AW; Ramasamy L; Cripe TP; Ahn CH
    Lab Chip; 2011 Jul; 11(14):2440-6. PubMed ID: 21655589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrochemical detection of glucose from whole blood using paper-based microfluidic devices.
    Noiphung J; Songjaroen T; Dungchai W; Henry CS; Chailapakul O; Laiwattanapaisal W
    Anal Chim Acta; 2013 Jul; 788():39-45. PubMed ID: 23845479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of potassium in red blood cells using unmeasured volumes of whole blood and combined sodium/potassium-selective membrane electrode measurements.
    Pietrzak M; Meyerhoff ME
    Anal Chem; 2009 Jul; 81(14):5961-5. PubMed ID: 19601656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intravenous fluids cause systemic bias in a conductivity-based point-of-care hematocrit meter.
    Wu P; Morey TE; Harris NS; Gravenstein N; Rice MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Feb; 114(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 22156329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement of electrical blood hematocrit measurements under various plasma conditions using a novel hematocrit estimation parameter.
    Kim M; Kim A; Kim S; Yang S
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2012 May; 35(1):416-420. PubMed ID: 22405844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of manual hematocrit determinations versus automated methods for hematopoietic progenitor cell apheresis products.
    Avecilla ST; Marionneaux SM; Leiva TD; Tonon JA; Chan VT; Moung C; Meagher RC; Maslak P
    Transfusion; 2016 Feb; 56(2):528-32. PubMed ID: 26395285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Red blood cell quantification microfluidic chip using polyelectrolytic gel electrodes.
    Kim KB; Chun H; Kim HC; Chung TD
    Electrophoresis; 2009 May; 30(9):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19340832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of hematocrit on accuracy of two point-of-care glucometers for use in dogs.
    Paul AE; Shiel RE; Juvet F; Mooney CT; Mansfield CS
    Am J Vet Res; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1204-8. PubMed ID: 21879978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coincidence detection of heterogeneous cell populations from whole blood with coplanar electrodes in a microfluidic impedance cytometer.
    Hassan U; Bashir R
    Lab Chip; 2014 Nov; 14(22):4370-81. PubMed ID: 25231594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct current insulator-based dielectrophoretic characterization of erythrocytes: ABO-Rh human blood typing.
    Srivastava SK; Artemiou A; Minerick AR
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(18):2530-40. PubMed ID: 21922495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemometric determination of blood parameters using visible-near-infrared spectra.
    Meinke M; Gersonde I; Friebel M; Helfmann J; Müller G
    Appl Spectrosc; 2005 Jun; 59(6):826-35. PubMed ID: 16053549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.