These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25640638)
1. A reference image-based method for optimization of clinical immunohistochemistry. Kap M; Lam KH; Ewing-Graham P; Riegman P Histopathology; 2015 Aug; 67(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25640638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating real-time immunohistochemistry on multiple tissue samples, multiple targets and multiple antibody labeling methods. Dubois L; Andersson K; Asplund A; Björkelund H BMC Res Notes; 2013 Dec; 6():542. PubMed ID: 24350799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External quality assessment for immunohistochemistry: experiences from NordiQC. Nielsen S Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jul; 90(5):331-40. PubMed ID: 25901597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standardization of immunohistochemistry for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen-retrieval technique: from experiments to hypothesis. Shi SR; Liu C; Taylor CR J Histochem Cytochem; 2007 Feb; 55(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 16982846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synthetic Antigen Gels as Practical Controls for Standardized and Quantitative Immunohistochemistry. Hötzel KJ; Havnar CA; Ngu HV; Rost S; Liu SD; Rangell LK; Peale FV J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 May; 67(5):309-334. PubMed ID: 30879407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of fixation method and duration of archiving on immunohistochemical staining intensity in embryonic and fetal tissues. Tauber Z; Stetkova I; Cizkova K Ann Anat; 2019 Jul; 224():55-61. PubMed ID: 31005572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative assessment of relative changes of immunohistochemical staining by light microscopy in specified anatomical regions. Paizs M; Engelhardt JI; Siklós L J Microsc; 2009 Apr; 234(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 19335461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Young investigator challenge: Validation and optimization of immunohistochemistry protocols for use on cellient cell block specimens. Sauter JL; Grogg KL; Vrana JA; Law ME; Halvorson JL; Henry MR Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 26882197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital immunohistochemistry platform for the staining variation monitoring based on integration of image and statistical analyses with laboratory information system. Laurinaviciene A; Plancoulaine B; Baltrusaityte I; Meskauskas R; Besusparis J; Lesciute-Krilaviciene D; Raudeliunas D; Iqbal Y; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10. PubMed ID: 25565007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An enhanced antigen-retrieval protocol for immunohistochemical staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Syrbu SI; Cohen MB Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 717():101-10. PubMed ID: 21370027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of heat-induced antigen retrieval following inconsistent formalin fixation. Boenisch T Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2005 Sep; 13(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 16082257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Making a science out of preanalytics: An analytical method to determine optimal tissue fixation in real-time. Bauer DR; Leibold T; Chafin DR PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258495. PubMed ID: 34648597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of different methodologies and cryostat versus paraffin sections for chromogenic immunohistochemistry. Hira VVV; de Jong AL; Ferro K; Khurshed M; Molenaar RJ; Van Noorden CJF Acta Histochem; 2019 Feb; 121(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 30454859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tonsil surface epithelium is ideal for monitoring Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining. Hsu CY; Yang CF; Liao LR; Ho HL; Ho DM Histopathology; 2013 Dec; 63(6):810-6. PubMed ID: 24024498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays. Simon R; Mirlacher M; Sauter G Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 664():113-26. PubMed ID: 20690058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can a more selective application of antigen retrieval facilitate standardization in immunohistochemistry? Boenisch T Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2004 Jun; 12(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 15354745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring. Rizzardi AE; Johnson AT; Vogel RI; Pambuccian SE; Henriksen J; Skubitz AP; Metzger GJ; Schmechel SC Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 7():42. PubMed ID: 22515559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mouse spleen tissue as a staining intensity reference for immunohistochemistry. Moon Y; Park G; Han K; Kang CS; Lee W Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 38(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 18715848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of crosslinking and non-crosslinking fixatives on antigen retrieval and immunohistochemistry. Stumptner C; Pabst D; Loibner M; Viertler C; Zatloukal K N Biotechnol; 2019 Sep; 52():69-83. PubMed ID: 31082574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]