BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25640638)

  • 1. A reference image-based method for optimization of clinical immunohistochemistry.
    Kap M; Lam KH; Ewing-Graham P; Riegman P
    Histopathology; 2015 Aug; 67(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 25640638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating real-time immunohistochemistry on multiple tissue samples, multiple targets and multiple antibody labeling methods.
    Dubois L; Andersson K; Asplund A; Björkelund H
    BMC Res Notes; 2013 Dec; 6():542. PubMed ID: 24350799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External quality assessment for immunohistochemistry: experiences from NordiQC.
    Nielsen S
    Biotech Histochem; 2015 Jul; 90(5):331-40. PubMed ID: 25901597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardization of immunohistochemistry for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen-retrieval technique: from experiments to hypothesis.
    Shi SR; Liu C; Taylor CR
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2007 Feb; 55(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 16982846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthetic Antigen Gels as Practical Controls for Standardized and Quantitative Immunohistochemistry.
    Hötzel KJ; Havnar CA; Ngu HV; Rost S; Liu SD; Rangell LK; Peale FV
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 May; 67(5):309-334. PubMed ID: 30879407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental validation of peptide immunohistochemistry controls.
    Bogen SA; Vani K; McGraw B; Federico V; Habib I; Zeheb R; Luther E; Tristram C; Sompuram SR
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2009 May; 17(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 19077907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of fixation method and duration of archiving on immunohistochemical staining intensity in embryonic and fetal tissues.
    Tauber Z; Stetkova I; Cizkova K
    Ann Anat; 2019 Jul; 224():55-61. PubMed ID: 31005572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative assessment of relative changes of immunohistochemical staining by light microscopy in specified anatomical regions.
    Paizs M; Engelhardt JI; Siklós L
    J Microsc; 2009 Apr; 234(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 19335461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Young investigator challenge: Validation and optimization of immunohistochemistry protocols for use on cellient cell block specimens.
    Sauter JL; Grogg KL; Vrana JA; Law ME; Halvorson JL; Henry MR
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Feb; 124(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 26882197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital immunohistochemistry platform for the staining variation monitoring based on integration of image and statistical analyses with laboratory information system.
    Laurinaviciene A; Plancoulaine B; Baltrusaityte I; Meskauskas R; Besusparis J; Lesciute-Krilaviciene D; Raudeliunas D; Iqbal Y; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
    Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10. PubMed ID: 25565007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An enhanced antigen-retrieval protocol for immunohistochemical staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.
    Syrbu SI; Cohen MB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 717():101-10. PubMed ID: 21370027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of heat-induced antigen retrieval following inconsistent formalin fixation.
    Boenisch T
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2005 Sep; 13(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 16082257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making a science out of preanalytics: An analytical method to determine optimal tissue fixation in real-time.
    Bauer DR; Leibold T; Chafin DR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258495. PubMed ID: 34648597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different methodologies and cryostat versus paraffin sections for chromogenic immunohistochemistry.
    Hira VVV; de Jong AL; Ferro K; Khurshed M; Molenaar RJ; Van Noorden CJF
    Acta Histochem; 2019 Feb; 121(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 30454859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tonsil surface epithelium is ideal for monitoring Ki-67 immunohistochemical staining.
    Hsu CY; Yang CF; Liao LR; Ho HL; Ho DM
    Histopathology; 2013 Dec; 63(6):810-6. PubMed ID: 24024498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays.
    Simon R; Mirlacher M; Sauter G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 664():113-26. PubMed ID: 20690058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can a more selective application of antigen retrieval facilitate standardization in immunohistochemistry?
    Boenisch T
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2004 Jun; 12(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 15354745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring.
    Rizzardi AE; Johnson AT; Vogel RI; Pambuccian SE; Henriksen J; Skubitz AP; Metzger GJ; Schmechel SC
    Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 7():42. PubMed ID: 22515559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mouse spleen tissue as a staining intensity reference for immunohistochemistry.
    Moon Y; Park G; Han K; Kang CS; Lee W
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 38(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 18715848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of crosslinking and non-crosslinking fixatives on antigen retrieval and immunohistochemistry.
    Stumptner C; Pabst D; Loibner M; Viertler C; Zatloukal K
    N Biotechnol; 2019 Sep; 52():69-83. PubMed ID: 31082574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.