These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25640747)

  • 1. Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(9):1560-76. PubMed ID: 25640747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Weighted Youden index and its two-independent-sample comparison based on weighted sensitivity and specificity.
    Li DL; Shen F; Yin Y; Peng JX; Chen PY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar; 126(6):1150-4. PubMed ID: 23506596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Reiser B; Nakas CT
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):635-6. PubMed ID: 26776063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to comment on 'Efficient statistical tests to compare Youden index: accounting for contingency correlation'.
    Chen F; Xue Y; Tan MT; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):637-40. PubMed ID: 26776064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Construction of confidence regions in the ROC space after the estimation of the optimal Youden index-based cut-off point.
    Bantis LE; Nakas CT; Reiser B
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):212-23. PubMed ID: 24261514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum binary cut-off threshold of a diagnostic test: comparison of different methods using Monte Carlo technique.
    Reibnegger G; Schrabmair W
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2014 Nov; 14():99. PubMed ID: 25421000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confidence intervals for the difference in paired Youden indices.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 23090764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing two diagnostic tests against the same "gold standard" in the same sample.
    Bloch DA
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 9147604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A model-free estimation for the covariate-adjusted Youden index and its associated cut-point.
    Xu T; Wang J; Fang Y
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4963-74. PubMed ID: 25156275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latent class models for medical diagnostic tests in multicenter trials.
    Mori J; Kano Y; Yoshizaki M; Fukinbara S
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(29):5091-105. PubMed ID: 24038422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
    Li C; Chen J; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint confidence region estimation for area under ROC curve and Youden index.
    Yin J; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(6):985-1000. PubMed ID: 24123069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
    van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating negative likelihood ratio confidence when test sensitivity is 100%: A bootstrapping approach.
    Marill KA; Chang Y; Wong KF; Friedman AB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1936-1948. PubMed ID: 26152746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the efficiency of bootstrap method into the analysis contingency table.
    Amiri S; von Rosen D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Nov; 104(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 21458876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Xu H; Craig BA
    Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1145-55. PubMed ID: 19210729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Joint estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures for paired organs--application in ophthalmology.
    de Leon AR; Soo A; Bonzo DC; Rudnisky CJ
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):837-50. PubMed ID: 19697307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal linear combinations of multiple diagnostic biomarkers based on Youden index.
    Yin J; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1426-40. PubMed ID: 24311111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.