242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25641452)
1. Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution.
Cerruto MA; Vianello F; D'Elia C; Artibani W; Novella G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2014 Dec; 86(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25641452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer.
Kawakami S; Yamamoto S; Numao N; Ishikawa Y; Kihara K; Fukui I
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 17681062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.
Hara R; Jo Y; Fujii T; Kondo N; Yokoyoma T; Miyaji Y; Nagai A
Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 18308081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.
Huang GL; Kang CH; Lee WC; Chiang PH
BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31660936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extensive biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach to improve prostate cancer detection.
Watanabe M; Hayashi T; Tsushima T; Irie S; Kaneshige T; Kumon H
Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):959-63. PubMed ID: 16351651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison Between a Combined Transrectal and Transperineal Approach and a Transrectal Approach for Prostate Rebiopsy.
Shida Y; Hakariya T; Takehara K; Onita T; Miyata Y; Sakai H
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4685-90. PubMed ID: 27630313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Xue J; Qin Z; Cai H; Zhang C; Li X; Xu W; Wang J; Xu Z; Yu B; Xu T; Zou Q
Oncotarget; 2017 Apr; 8(14):23322-23336. PubMed ID: 28177897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients.
Lu M; Luo Y; Wang Y; Yu J; Zheng H; Yang Z
BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):11. PubMed ID: 36709292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shen PF; Zhu YC; Wei WR; Li YZ; Yang J; Li YT; Li DM; Wang J; Zeng H
Asian J Androl; 2012 Mar; 14(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22101942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transperineal extended biopsy improves the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate: a comparative study of 6 and 12 biopsy cores.
Takenaka A; Hara R; Hyodo Y; Ishimura T; Sakai Y; Fujioka H; Fujii T; Jo Y; Fujisawa M
Int J Urol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 16448425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy.
Takenaka A; Hara R; Ishimura T; Fujii T; Jo Y; Nagai A; Fujisawa M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 17533394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association.
Koparal MY; Sözen TS; Karşıyakalı N; Aslan G; Akdoğan B; Şahin B; Türkeri L;
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 34927740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Best approach for prostate cancer detection: a prospective study on transperineal versus transrectal six-core prostate biopsy.
Emiliozzi P; Corsetti A; Tassi B; Federico G; Martini M; Pansadoro V
Urology; 2003 May; 61(5):961-6. PubMed ID: 12736016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the complications of traditional 12 cores transrectal prostate biopsy with image fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy.
Huang H; Wang W; Lin T; Zhang Q; Zhao X; Lian H; Guo H
BMC Urol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):68. PubMed ID: 27855661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal biopsies for efficient detection of stage T1c prostate cancer.
Kawakami S; Hyochi N; Yonese J; Yano M; Fujii Y; Kageyama Y; Fukui I; Kihara K
Int J Clin Oncol; 2006 Apr; 11(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16622747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The incidence of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen greater than 4.0 ng/ml: a randomized study of 6 versus 12 core transperineal prostate biopsy.
Emiliozzi P; Scarpone P; DePaula F; Pizzo M; Federico G; Pansadoro A; Martini M; Pansadoro V
J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):197-9. PubMed ID: 14665875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy.
Miller J; Perumalla C; Heap G
ANZ J Surg; 2005; 75(1-2):48-50. PubMed ID: 15740517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients.
Symons JL; Huo A; Yuen CL; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Sutherland RL; Brenner P; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2013 Sep; 112(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 23551500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
