These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25642176)

  • 1. A neural trait approach to exploring individual differences in social preferences.
    Nash K; Gianotti LR; Knoch D
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2014; 8():458. PubMed ID: 25642176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Your perspective and my benefit: multiple lesion models of self-other integration strategies during social bargaining.
    Melloni M; Billeke P; Baez S; Hesse E; de la Fuente L; Forno G; Birba A; García-Cordero I; Serrano C; Plastino A; Slachevsky A; Huepe D; Sigman M; Manes F; García AM; Sedeño L; Ibáñez A
    Brain; 2016 Nov; 139(11):3022-3040. PubMed ID: 27679483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual Differences in Subjective Utility and Risk Preferences: The Influence of Hedonic Capacity and Trait Anxiety.
    Howlett JR; Paulus MP
    Front Psychiatry; 2017; 8():88. PubMed ID: 28588508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.
    Hickie IB; Scott EM; Cross SP; Iorfino F; Davenport TA; Guastella AJ; Naismith SL; Carpenter JS; Rohleder C; Crouse JJ; Hermens DF; Koethe D; Markus Leweke F; Tickell AM; Sawrikar V; Scott J
    Med J Aust; 2019 Nov; 211 Suppl 9():S3-S46. PubMed ID: 31679171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Interpersonal Traits in Social Decision Making: Exploring Sources of Behavioral Heterogeneity in Economic Games.
    Zhao K; Smillie LD
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Aug; 19(3):277-302. PubMed ID: 25552474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resting-state Functional Connectivity and Deception: Exploring Individualized Deceptive Propensity by Machine Learning.
    Tang H; Lu X; Cui Z; Feng C; Lin Q; Cui X; Su S; Liu C
    Neuroscience; 2018 Dec; 395():101-112. PubMed ID: 30394323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.
    Harris A; Clithero JA; Hutcherson CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(37):7952-7968. PubMed ID: 30076214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Individual Differences in Control-Averse Behavior.
    Rudorf S; Schmelz K; Baumgartner T; Wiest R; Fischbacher U; Knoch D
    J Neurosci; 2018 May; 38(22):5196-5208. PubMed ID: 29760183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.
    Goh JO; Su YS; Tang YJ; McCarrey AC; Tereshchenko A; Elkins W; Resnick SM
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(49):12498-12509. PubMed ID: 27927964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in visualization and childhood play preferences.
    Blazhenkova O; Booth RW
    Heliyon; 2020 Jun; 6(6):e03953. PubMed ID: 32551373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A neural marker of costly punishment behavior.
    Knoch D; Gianotti LR; Baumgartner T; Fehr E
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 20424065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol.
    van der Weijden T; Légaré F; Boivin A; Burgers JS; van Veenendaal H; Stiggelbout AM; Faber M; Elwyn G
    Implement Sci; 2010 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 20205815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What Is Important When Making Treatment Decisions in Metastatic Breast Cancer? A Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making in Patients and Oncologists.
    Rocque GB; Rasool A; Williams BR; Wallace AS; Niranjan SJ; Halilova KI; Turkman YE; Ingram SA; Williams CP; Forero-Torres A; Smith T; Bhatia S; Knight SJ
    Oncologist; 2019 Oct; 24(10):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 30872466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding Individual Differences in Domain-General Prosociality: A Resting EEG Study.
    Gianotti LRR; Dahinden FM; Baumgartner T; Knoch D
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Jan; 32(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 30267176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence.
    Zheng Y; Yang Z; Jin C; Qi Y; Liu X
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1592. PubMed ID: 28974937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The neural processes underlying perceptual decision making in humans: recent progress and future directions.
    Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
    J Physiol Paris; 2015; 109(1-3):27-37. PubMed ID: 25204272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in decision making competence revealed by multivariate fMRI.
    Talukdar T; Román FJ; Operskalski JT; Zwilling CE; Barbey AK
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Jun; 39(6):2664-2672. PubMed ID: 29516582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-construals moderate associations between trait creativity and social brain network.
    Liu Y; Wu B; Petti C; Wu X; Han S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():284-291. PubMed ID: 29432769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social preferences under chronic stress.
    Ceccato S; Kettner SE; Kudielka BM; Schwieren C; Voss A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199528. PubMed ID: 30020926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reward circuitry activation reflects social preferences in the face of cognitive effort.
    Sullivan-Toole H; Dobryakova E; DePasque S; Tricomi E
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Feb; 123():55-66. PubMed ID: 29906456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.