These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2779 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25642633)

  • 1. Efficient Bayesian mixed-model analysis increases association power in large cohorts.
    Loh PR; Tucker G; Bulik-Sullivan BK; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Finucane HK; Salem RM; Chasman DI; Ridker PM; Neale BM; Berger B; Patterson N; Price AL
    Nat Genet; 2015 Mar; 47(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 25642633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations.
    Segura V; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Platt A; Korte A; Seren Ü; Long Q; Nordborg M
    Nat Genet; 2012 Jun; 44(7):825-30. PubMed ID: 22706313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decomposing genomic variance using information from GWA, GWE and eQTL analysis.
    Ehsani A; Janss L; Pomp D; Sørensen P
    Anim Genet; 2016 Apr; 47(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 26678352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inference on the Genetic Basis of Eye and Skin Color in an Admixed Population via Bayesian Linear Mixed Models.
    Lloyd-Jones LR; Robinson MR; Moser G; Zeng J; Beleza S; Barsh GS; Tang H; Visscher PM
    Genetics; 2017 Jun; 206(2):1113-1126. PubMed ID: 28381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
    Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian model comparison in genetic association analysis: linear mixed modeling and SNP set testing.
    Wen X
    Biostatistics; 2015 Oct; 16(4):701-12. PubMed ID: 25796429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples.
    Zhang K; Sun F
    BMC Genet; 2005 Oct; 6():51. PubMed ID: 16236175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient multiple-trait association and estimation of genetic correlation using the matrix-variate linear mixed model.
    Furlotte NA; Eskin E
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25724382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An efficient empirical Bayes method for genomewide association studies.
    Wang Q; Wei J; Pan Y; Xu S
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Aug; 133(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 26582716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A variance components factor model for genetic association studies: a Bayesian analysis.
    Nonyane BA; Whittaker JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 34(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 20718044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Lasso multi-marker mixed model for association mapping with population structure correction.
    Rakitsch B; Lippert C; Stegle O; Borgwardt K
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 29(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 23175758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian method for gene detection and mapping, using a case and control design and DNA pooling.
    Johnson T
    Biostatistics; 2007 Jul; 8(3):546-65. PubMed ID: 16984977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast and flexible linear mixed models for genome-wide genetics.
    Runcie DE; Crawford L
    PLoS Genet; 2019 Feb; 15(2):e1007978. PubMed ID: 30735486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear score tests for variance components in linear mixed models and applications to genetic association studies.
    Qu L; Guennel T; Marshall SL
    Biometrics; 2013 Dec; 69(4):883-92. PubMed ID: 24328714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
    Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical Bayes method for estimating epistatic effects of quantitative trait loci.
    Xu S
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 17688503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
    Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of association mapping methods in a complex pedigreed population.
    Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Janss L; Lund MS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 34(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 20568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide associations for fertility traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows using data from experimental research herds in four European countries.
    Berry DP; Bastiaansen JW; Veerkamp RF; Wijga S; Wall E; Berglund B; Calus MP
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1206-15. PubMed ID: 23217223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining Sparse Group Lasso and Linear Mixed Model Improves Power to Detect Genetic Variants Underlying Quantitative Traits.
    Guo Y; Wu C; Guo M; Zou Q; Liu X; Keinan A
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():271. PubMed ID: 31024614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 139.