These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25642933)

  • 1. Does a web-based feedback training program result in improved reliability in clinicians' ratings of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale?
    Støre-Valen J; Ryum T; Pedersen GA; Pripp AH; Jose PE; Karterud S
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Sep; 27(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 25642933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are GAF scores reliable in routine clinical use?
    Vatnaland T; Vatnaland J; Friis S; Opjordsmoen S
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2007 Apr; 115(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 17355524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of global assessment of functioning ratings made by clinical psychiatric staff.
    Söderberg P; Tungström S; Armelius BA
    Psychiatr Serv; 2005 Apr; 56(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 15812093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are medical students assigning proper global assessment of functioning scores?
    Warsi MK; Sattar SP; Din AU; Petty F; Padala PR
    Acad Psychiatry; 2007; 31(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17242052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Web-based assessment of depression in patients treated in clinical practice: reliability, validity, and patient acceptance.
    Zimmerman M; Martinez JH
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2012 Mar; 73(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 22154899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Qualitative Study of Clinicians Experience with Rating of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale.
    Aas IHM; Sonesson O; Torp S
    Community Ment Health J; 2018 Jan; 54(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 27904986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).
    Jones SH; Thornicroft G; Coffey M; Dunn G
    Br J Psychiatry; 1995 May; 166(5):654-9. PubMed ID: 7620753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale.
    Hall RC
    Psychosomatics; 1995; 36(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 7638314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global Assessment of Functioning ratings and the allocation and outcomes of mental health services.
    Moos RH; Nichol AC; Moos BS
    Psychiatr Serv; 2002 Jun; 53(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 12045311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in clinical outpatients with depressive disorders.
    Grootenboer EM; Giltay EJ; van der Lem R; van Veen T; van der Wee NJ; Zitman FG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):502-7. PubMed ID: 21223457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of Web-based Braden Scale training on the reliability of Braden subscale ratings.
    Magnan MA; Maklebust J
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 19096357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) in a naturalistic clinical setting: Inter-rater reliability and comparison with expert ratings.
    Lundh A; Kowalski J; Sundberg CJ; Gumpert C; Landén M
    Psychiatry Res; 2010 May; 177(1-2):206-10. PubMed ID: 20334931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global assessment of psychosocial functioning in child and adolescent psychiatry. A review of three unidimensional scales (CGAS, GAF, GAPD).
    Schorre BE; Vandvik IH
    Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2004 Oct; 13(5):273-86. PubMed ID: 15490275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V scales in a clinical sample of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.
    Jovanović AA; Gasić MJ; Ivković M; Milovanović S; Damjanović A
    Psychiatr Danub; 2008 Sep; 20(3):286-300. PubMed ID: 18827754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The actual process of rating the global assessment of functioning scale.
    Yamauchi K; Ono Y; Baba K; Ikegami N
    Compr Psychiatry; 2001; 42(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 11559867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of brief training on reliability and applicability of Global Assessment of functioning scale by Psychiatric clinical officers in Uganda.
    Abbo C; Okello ES; Nakku J
    Afr Health Sci; 2013 Mar; 13(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 23658571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excellent reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-21) in Indonesia after training.
    Istriana E; Kurnia A; Weijers A; Hidayat T; Pinxten L; de Jong C; Schellekens A
    Asia Pac Psychiatry; 2013 Sep; 5(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 23868541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the Global Assessment of Function scale in learning disability.
    Oliver P; Cooray S; Tyrer P; Cicchetti D
    Br J Psychiatry Suppl; 2003 Jan; 44():S32-5. PubMed ID: 12509307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrater Reliability of Standardized Actors Versus Nonactors in a Simulation Based Assessment of Interprofessional Collaboration.
    Dickter DN; Stielstra S; Lineberry M
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Aug; 10(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 26098494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interrater reliability issues in multicenter trials, Part II: Statistical procedures used in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #394.
    Edson R; Lavori P; Tracy K; Adler LA; Rotrosen J
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1997; 33(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 9133752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.