These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25642973)

  • 1. Children's performance on ground rules questions: implications for forensic interviewing.
    Dickinson JJ; Brubacher SP; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 25642973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.
    Earhart B; La Rooy DJ; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):746-61. PubMed ID: 25424612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploratory assessments of child abuse: children's responses to interviewer's questions across multiple interview sessions.
    Patterson T; Pipe ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2009 Aug; 33(8):490-504. PubMed ID: 19766310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting the Ground Rules: Use and Practice of Ground Rules in Child Forensic Interviews.
    Fessinger MB; McWilliams K; Bakth FN; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2021 Feb; 26(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 32208866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental differences in children's learning and use of forensic ground rules during an interview about an experienced event.
    Brown DA; Lewis CN; Lamb ME; Gwynne J; Kitto O; Stairmand M
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Aug; 55(8):1626-1639. PubMed ID: 31192645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of question repetition within interviews on young children's eyewitness recall.
    Krähenbühl S; Blades M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 16438980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.
    Schaeffer P; Leventhal JM; Asnes AG
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 May; 35(5):343-52. PubMed ID: 21620161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judges' delivery of ground rules to child witnesses in Australian courts.
    Earhart B; Brubacher SP; Powell MB; Westera NJ; Goodman-Delahunty J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Dec; 74():62-72. PubMed ID: 28882320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigative Interviewing of Aboriginal Children in Cases of Suspected Sexual Abuse.
    Hamilton G; Brubacher SP; Powell MB
    J Child Sex Abus; 2016; 25(4):363-81. PubMed ID: 27266534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Helping children correctly say "I don't know" to unanswerable questions.
    Waterman AH; Blades M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):396-405. PubMed ID: 22059954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of interviewing techniques on young children's responses to questions.
    Krähenbühl S; Blades M
    Child Care Health Dev; 2006 May; 32(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 16634977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of repeated interviewing in children's responses to cross-examination-style questioning.
    O'Neill S; Zajac R
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(1):14-38. PubMed ID: 23320440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.
    Chouinard MM
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2007; 72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. PubMed ID: 17394580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Don't know responding in young maltreated children: The effects of wh- questions type and enhanced interview instructions.
    McWilliams K; Williams S; Stolzenberg SN; Evans AD; Lyon TD
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):124-137. PubMed ID: 34110874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comfort drawing during investigative interviews: evidence of the safety of a popular practice.
    Poole DA; Dickinson JJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2014 Feb; 38(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 23773954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec.
    Cyr M; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2009 May; 33(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 19481261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of paraphrasing in investigative interviews.
    Evans AD; Roberts KP; Price HL; Stefek CP
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Aug; 34(8):585-92. PubMed ID: 20541260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Guiding Ground Rules and Individual Differences on the Accuracy of Children's Free Recall and Suggestibility.
    Lee S; Chung HJ
    J Child Sex Abus; 2023; 32(7):829-844. PubMed ID: 37753948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence supporting restrictions on uses of body diagrams in forensic interviews.
    Poole DA; Dickinson JJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Sep; 35(9):659-69. PubMed ID: 21940047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's Signaling of Incomprehension: The Diagnosticity of Practice Questions During Interview Instructions.
    Henderson HM; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2021 Feb; 26(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33176442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.