These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25643119)

  • 1. Confounding adjustment and exposure prediction in environmental epidemiology: additional insights.
    Dominici F; Cefalu M
    Epidemiology; 2015 Mar; 26(2):e28. PubMed ID: 25643119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does exposure prediction bias health-effect estimation?: The relationship between confounding adjustment and exposure prediction.
    Cefalu M; Dominici F
    Epidemiology; 2014 Jul; 25(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 24815302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation with vanishing baseline risk.
    Park RM
    Epidemiology; 2012 Nov; 23(6):937-8. PubMed ID: 23038127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Counterfactual prediction is not only for causal inference.
    Dickerman BA; Hernán MA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 35(7):615-617. PubMed ID: 32623620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A sequential conditional mean model for assessing total effects of exposure in longitudinal data].
    Wang XL; Tian MY; Zhang N; Gao H; Tan HZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jan; 41(1):111-114. PubMed ID: 32062952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to implement directed acyclic graphs to reduce bias in addiction research.
    Wouk K; Bauer AE; Gottfredson NC
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():109-116. PubMed ID: 30292573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical spatial-temporal modeling of ambient ozone exposure for environmental epidemiology studies: A review.
    Ma R; Ban J; Wang Q; Li T
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jan; 701():134463. PubMed ID: 31704405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bounds for pure direct effect.
    Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Phiri K
    Epidemiology; 2014 Sep; 25(5):775-6. PubMed ID: 25076155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theorems, proofs, examples, and rules in the practice of epidemiology.
    Vanderweele TJ; Ogburnb EL
    Epidemiology; 2012 May; 23(3):443-5. PubMed ID: 22475829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response to invited commentary. Rose et al. respond to "G-computation and standardization in epidemiology".
    Rose S; Snowden JM; Mortimer KM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):743-4. PubMed ID: 21415030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Panel discussion review: session three--issues involved in interpretation of epidemiologic analyses--statistical modeling.
    Bateson TF; Coull BA; Hubbell B; Ito K; Jerrett M; Lumley T; Thomas D; Vedal S; Ross M
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 17 Suppl 2():S90-6. PubMed ID: 18079770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect modification in epidemiology and medicine.
    Kamangar F
    Arch Iran Med; 2012 Sep; 15(9):575-82. PubMed ID: 22924379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model-averaged confounder adjustment for estimating multivariate exposure effects with linear regression.
    Wilson A; Zigler CM; Patel CJ; Dominici F
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):1034-1044. PubMed ID: 29569228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atmospheric pollutants and mortalities in English local authority areas. Author's response.
    Knox EG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):591. PubMed ID: 19525254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and analysis issues in gene and environment studies.
    Liu CY; Maity A; Lin X; Wright RO; Christiani DC
    Environ Health; 2012 Dec; 11():93. PubMed ID: 23253229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding.
    Fu EL; Groenwold RHH; Zoccali C; Jager KJ; van Diepen M; Dekker FW
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1629-1635. PubMed ID: 30215791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insights on bias and information in group-level studies.
    Sheppard L
    Biostatistics; 2003 Apr; 4(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 12925521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Regression models in periodontal epidemiology: purpose, approach and interpretation.
    Jimenez M; Dietrich T
    Periodontol 2000; 2012 Feb; 58(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 22133371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confounding and Bias in Epidemiological Research: "Dirty Hands but a Clean Mind".
    Wilkie M
    Perit Dial Int; 2015 Dec; 35(7):675-6. PubMed ID: 26703841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.