218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25644038)
21. Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests.
Daemen A; Valentin L; Fruscio R; Van Holsbeke C; Melis GB; Guerriero S; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Ombelet W; Rossi A; Vergote I; Bourne T; De Moor B; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 20814878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Value of Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adnexa in the Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Ovarian Tumor and Benign Ovarian Tumor: A Meta-analysis.
Yue X; Zhong L; Wang Y; Zhang C; Chen X; Wang S; Hu J; Hu J; Wang C; Liu X
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 May; 48(5):730-742. PubMed ID: 35272892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of malignant pulmonary nodules and masses.
Li B; Li Q; Chen C; Guan Y; Liu S
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24331261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.
Ma X; Liu R; Zhu C; Zhang J; Ling W
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2095-102. PubMed ID: 27503752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Hu Q; Wang XY; Zhu SY; Kang LK; Xiao YJ; Zheng HY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24436445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of ultrasonography with color Doppler in ovarian tumor: a systematic quantitative review.
Medeiros LR; Rosa DD; da Rosa MI; Bozzetti MC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1214-20. PubMed ID: 19823057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems For Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cui L; Xu H; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 34217614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound for characterizing adnexal masses.
Huchon C; Metzger U; Bats AS; Bensaid C; Chatellier G; Azizi M; Lefrère-Belda MA; Dujardin A; Bernard JP; Lécuru F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 May; 38(5):832-40. PubMed ID: 22413992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant solid breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wubulihasimu M; Maimaitusun M; Xu XL; Liu XD; Luo BM
Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):936-943. PubMed ID: 30297035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of ultrasound pattern recognition by expert operators to identify borderline ovarian tumors: a study of diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement.
Yazbek J; Ameye L; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Valentin L; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 19746450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma.
Liu J; Xu Y; Wang J
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jun; 62(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 17433597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Sonographic diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors].
Marret H; Cayrol M
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Dec; 42(8):730-43. PubMed ID: 24200073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three-dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses.
Sladkevicius P; Jokubkiene L; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 30(6):874-82. PubMed ID: 17943717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ultrasound image analysis using deep neural networks for discriminating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors: comparison with expert subjective assessment.
Christiansen F; Epstein EL; Smedberg E; Åkerlund M; Smith K; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 57(1):155-163. PubMed ID: 33142359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
Wang WH; Zheng CB; Gao JN; Ren SS; Nie GY; Li ZQ
Gland Surg; 2022 Feb; 11(2):330-340. PubMed ID: 35284306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
