These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25644546)

  • 1. The discrepancy between maximum in vitro exposure levels and realistic conservative exposure levels of mobile phones operating at 900/1800 MHz.
    Schmid G; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2015 Feb; 36(2):133-48. PubMed ID: 25644546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interaction of mobile phones with superficial passive metallic implants.
    Virtanen H; Huttunen J; Toropainen A; Lappalainen R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2689-700. PubMed ID: 15901963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of mobile phone design features affecting radiofrequency power absorbed in a human head phantom.
    Kuehn S; Kelsh MA; Kuster N; Sheppard AR; Shum M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2013 Sep; 34(6):479-88. PubMed ID: 23533135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of three-dimensional SAR distributions emitted by mobile phones in an epidemiological perspective.
    Deltour I; Wiart J; Taki M; Wake K; Varsier N; Mann S; Schüz J; Cardis E
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2011 Dec; 32(8):634-43. PubMed ID: 21695709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the influence of handset phone position on RF exposure of brain tissue.
    Ghanmi A; Varsier N; Hadjem A; Conil E; Picon O; Wiart J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Dec; 35(8):568-79. PubMed ID: 25263784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between mobile phone use and semen quality: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu K; Li Y; Zhang G; Liu J; Cao J; Ao L; Zhang S
    Andrology; 2014 Jul; 2(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 24700791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exposure to GSM RF fields does not affect calcium homeostasis in human endothelial cells, rat pheocromocytoma cells or rat hippocampal neurons.
    O'Connor RP; Madison SD; Leveque P; Roderick HL; Bootman MD
    PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11828. PubMed ID: 20676401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mobile Phone Radiation: Physiological & Pathophysiologcal Considerations.
    K Sri N
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 26685499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure system to study hypotheses of ELF and RF electromagnetic field interactions of mobile phones with the central nervous system.
    Murbach M; Christopoulou M; Crespo-Valero P; Achermann P; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Sep; 33(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 22331550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards.
    Hardell L; Sage C
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 62(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18242044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs.
    Repacholi MH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1998; 19(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 9453702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radio frequency electromagnetic field compliance assessment of multi-band and MIMO equipped radio base stations.
    Thors B; Thielens A; Fridén J; Colombi D; Törnevik C; Vermeeren G; Martens L; Joseph W
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 May; 35(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 24523232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Call-related factors influencing output power from mobile phones.
    Hillert L; Ahlbom A; Neasham D; Feychting M; Järup L; Navin R; Elliott P
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 16670713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 1800 MHz in vitro exposure device for experimental studies on the effects of mobile communication systems.
    Ardoino L; Lopresto V; Mancini S; Pinto R; Lovisolo GA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 15494360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling of EEG electrode artifacts and thermal ripples in human radiofrequency exposure studies.
    Murbach M; Neufeld E; Christopoulou M; Achermann P; Kuster N
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 May; 35(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 24523224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidance for exposure design of human studies addressing health risk evaluations of mobile phones.
    Kuster N; Schuderer J; Christ A; Futter P; Ebert S
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2004 Oct; 25(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 15376239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survey of RF exposure levels from mobile telephone base stations in Australia.
    Henderson SI; Bangay MJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Jan; 27(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 16283652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GFAP expression in the rat brain following sub-chronic exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field signal.
    Ammari M; Gamez C; Lecomte A; Sakly M; Abdelmelek H; De Seze R
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2010 May; 86(5):367-75. PubMed ID: 20397841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiological evidence for a health risk from mobile phone base stations.
    Khurana VG; Hardell L; Everaert J; Bortkiewicz A; Carlberg M; Ahonen M
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2010; 16(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 20662418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lack of adverse effects of whole-body exposure to a mobile telecommunication electromagnetic field on the rat fetus.
    Takahashi S; Imai N; Nabae K; Wake K; Kawai H; Wang J; Watanabe S; Kawabe M; Fujiwara O; Ogawa K; Tamano S; Shirai T
    Radiat Res; 2010 Mar; 173(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 20199221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.