143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25644786)
1. Comparison of signal and gap-detection thresholds for focused and broad cochlear implant electrode configurations.
Bierer JA; Deeks JM; Billig AJ; Carlyon RP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 16(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 25644786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interfaces: electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses measured with the partial tripolar configuration.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF; Tremblay KL
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 21178633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding.
Long CJ; Holden TA; McClelland GH; Parkinson WS; Shelton C; Kelsall DC; Smith ZM
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 15(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 24477546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants.
Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2372-84. PubMed ID: 10491701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between gap detection thresholds and loudness in cochlear-implant users.
Garadat SN; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):130-8. PubMed ID: 21168479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Detection Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships with Average Threshold, Gap Detection, and Rate Discrimination.
Carlyon RP; Cosentino S; Deeks JM; Parkinson W; Arenberg JG
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):559-567. PubMed ID: 29881937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, Electrode Position, and Behavioral Thresholds.
DeVries L; Scheperle R; Bierer JA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 17(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 26926152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):478-92. PubMed ID: 11784764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.
Hofmann M; Wouters J
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):573-89. PubMed ID: 22569837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.
Pfingst BE; Xu L
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 14605920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrode spanning with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.
Wu CC; Luo X
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):1023-36. PubMed ID: 24865767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level.
Middlebrooks JC; Bierer JA
J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):493-507. PubMed ID: 11784765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate discrimination, gap detection and ranking of temporal pitch in cochlear implant users.
Cosentino S; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Parkinson W; Bierer JA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 27101997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration.
Bierer JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1642-53. PubMed ID: 17407901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
