These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25646415)

  • 1. Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.
    Hainmueller J; Hangartner D; Yamamoto T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(8):2395-400. PubMed ID: 25646415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Naturalization fosters the long-term political integration of immigrants.
    Hainmueller J; Hangartner D; Pietrantuono G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(41):12651-6. PubMed ID: 26417099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.
    Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F
    Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of citizenship on the long-term earnings of marginalized immigrants: Quasi-experimental evidence from Switzerland.
    Hainmueller J; Hangartner D; Ward D
    Sci Adv; 2019 Dec; 5(12):eaay1610. PubMed ID: 31840075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient and parent preferences for immunoglobulin treatments: a conjoint analysis.
    Mohamed AF; Kilambi V; Luo MP; Iyer RG; Li-McLeod JM
    J Med Econ; 2012; 15(6):1183-91. PubMed ID: 22846048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pilot study of a hierarchical Bayes method for utility estimation in a choice-based conjoint analysis of prescription benefit plans including medication therapy management services.
    Wellman GS; Vidican C
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2008 Sep; 4(3):218-30. PubMed ID: 18794033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: feasibility assessment.
    Beusterien KM; Dziekan K; Flood E; Harding G; Jordan JC
    Value Health; 2005; 8(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 16091022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing companies' preferences for attributes of beef in Switzerland.
    Boesch I
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jan; 96(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 23896149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of children's preferences for influenza vaccine attributes.
    Flood EM; Ryan KJ; Rousculp MD; Beusterien KM; Block SL; Hall MC; Mahadevia PJ
    Vaccine; 2011 Jun; 29(26):4334-40. PubMed ID: 21510993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An approach to derive economic weights in breeding objectives using partial profile choice experiments.
    Nielsen HM; Amer PR
    Animal; 2007 Oct; 1(9):1254-62. PubMed ID: 22444881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?
    Bridges JF; Kinter ET; Schmeding A; Rudolph I; Mühlbacher A
    Patient; 2011; 4(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 21995832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation--a review of methods and applications.
    Alriksson S; Oberg T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 May; 15(3):244-57. PubMed ID: 18504844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicted preference conjoint analysis.
    Radas S; Prelec D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256010. PubMed ID: 34437566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.
    Reed Johnson F; Lancsar E; Marshall D; Kilambi V; Mühlbacher A; Regier DA; Bresnahan BW; Kanninen B; Bridges JF
    Value Health; 2013; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 23337210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating migraineurs' preferences for migraine treatment outcomes using a choice experiment.
    Gonzalez JM; Johnson FR; Runken MC; Poulos CM
    Headache; 2013; 53(10):1635-50. PubMed ID: 23808578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining immigrant naturalization.
    Yang PQ
    Int Migr Rev; 1994; 28(3):449-77. PubMed ID: 12345790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of the discrete choice experiment at the input and output level in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Skjoldborg US; Lauridsen J; Junker P
    Value Health; 2009; 12(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 19911446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hawaiian residents' preferences for Miconia control program attributes using conjoint choice experiment and latent class analysis.
    Chan-Halbrendt C; Lin T; Yang F; Sisior G
    Environ Manage; 2010 Feb; 45(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 20033159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. American immigration policy, Chinese immigration, and Chinese concentration in New York City.
    Chow CS
    Ingu munje nonjip; 1985 Jul; (8):109-28. PubMed ID: 12222470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.