BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25647258)

  • 21. Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopically assisted radical hysterectomy in treating early-stage cervical cancer.
    Lee CL; Wu KY; Huang KG; Lee PS; Yen CF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 203(2):165.e1-7. PubMed ID: 20462565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases.
    Chong GO; Park NY; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Nov; 19(8):1459-64. PubMed ID: 20009907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy based on the anatomic landmark of the uterus deep vein and its branches for cervical cancer].
    Liang MR; Han DX; Jiang W; Liu H; Li L; Zhong ML; Luo L; Zeng SY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 40(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 29730917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Hongladaromp W; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):887-90. PubMed ID: 24568513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early cervical cancer].
    Maffuz A; Quijano F; López D; Hernández-Ramírez D
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2010 Jul; 78(7):345-51. PubMed ID: 20931810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
    van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao MM; Cibula D; Wu X; Falconer H; Persson J; Perrotta M; Mosgaard BJ; Kucukmetin A; Berlev I; Rendon G; Liu K; Vieira M; Capilna ME; Fotopoulou C; Baiocchi G; Kaidarova D; Ribeiro R; Pedra-Nobre S; Kocian R; Li X; Li J; Pálsdóttir K; Noll F; Rundle S; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Gheorghe M; Saso S; Bolatbekova R; Tsunoda A; Pitcher B; Wu J; Urbauer D; Pareja R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):97.e1-97.e16. PubMed ID: 34461074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears.
    Nezhat F; Mahdavi A; Nagarsheth NP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 16431319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lymphadenectomy alone is a feasible option in managing incidentally-detected early-stage cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy without intermediate-risk factors: An application of the concept of less radical surgery.
    Jeon HW; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    Anticancer Res; 2013 Nov; 33(11):5135-41. PubMed ID: 24222161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
    Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Twelve years experience with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
    Suprasert P; Srisomboon J; Charoenkwan K; Siriaree S; Cheewakriangkrai C; Kietpeerakool C; Phongnarisorn C; Sae-Teng J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Apr; 30(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 20373935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Yan X; Li G; Shang H; Lin F; Yang X; Zheng F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22146764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
    Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.