These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25647504)

  • 1. Antibiofilm efficacy evaluation of a bioelectric dressing in mono- and multi-species biofilms.
    Kim H; Izadjoo MJ
    J Wound Care; 2015 Feb; 24 Suppl 2():S10-4. PubMed ID: 25647504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antimicrobial activity of a bioelectric dressing using an in vitro wound pathogen colony drip-flow reactor biofilm model.
    Kim H; Izadjoo M
    J Wound Care; 2016 Jul; 25(Sup7):S47-S52. PubMed ID: 29027847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of microelectric potentials in a bioelectrically-active wound care device in the presence of bacteria.
    Park SS; Kim H; Makin IR; Skiba JB; Izadjoo MJ
    J Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 24(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 25543820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings on wound microorganisms using an in vitro biofilm model.
    Percival SL; Bowler PG; Dolman J
    Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 17651233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel approach to antibiofilm susceptibility testing using a thermo-reversible matrix.
    Taylor BJ; Marsh LL; Nosworthy JO; Williams DW
    J Wound Care; 2016 Feb; 25(2):62, 64-7. PubMed ID: 26878297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antibacterial properties and reduction of MRSA biofilm with a dressing combining polyabsorbent fibres and a silver matrix.
    Desroche N; Dropet C; Janod P; Guzzo J
    J Wound Care; 2016 Oct; 25(10):577-584. PubMed ID: 27681588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens.
    Kim H; Makin I; Skiba J; Ho A; Housler G; Stojadinovic A; Izadjoo M
    Open Microbiol J; 2014; 8():15-21. PubMed ID: 24627730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A.D.A.M. test (Antibiofilm Dressing's Activity Measurement) - Simple method for evaluating anti-biofilm activity of drug-saturated dressings against wound pathogens.
    Junka AF; Żywicka A; Szymczyk P; Dziadas M; Bartoszewicz M; Fijałkowski K
    J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Dec; 143():6-12. PubMed ID: 28962915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced Performance and Mode of Action of a Novel Antibiofilm Hydrofiber® Wound Dressing.
    Parsons D; Meredith K; Rowlands VJ; Short D; Metcalf DG; Bowler PG
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7616471. PubMed ID: 27990437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating antibiotics for use in medicine using a poloxamer biofilm model.
    Clutterbuck AL; Cochrane CA; Dolman J; Percival SL
    Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob; 2007 Feb; 6():2. PubMed ID: 17302978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of biofilm-targeted antimicrobial wound dressing for the treatment of chronic wound infections.
    Ng SF; Leow HL
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2015; 41(11):1902-9. PubMed ID: 25758412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.
    Percival SL; Bowler P; Woods EJ
    Wound Repair Regen; 2008; 16(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 18211579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of biofilm treatments on the multi-species Lubbock chronic wound biofilm model.
    Dowd SE; Sun Y; Smith E; Kennedy JP; Jones CE; Wolcott R
    J Wound Care; 2009 Dec; 18(12):508, 510-12. PubMed ID: 20081576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Molecular Determinants of the Thickened Matrix in a Dual-Species Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm.
    Lee K; Lee KM; Kim D; Yoon SS
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Nov; 83(21):. PubMed ID: 28842537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. TA-AgNPs/Alginate Hydrogel and Its Potential Application as a Promising Antibiofilm Material against Polymicrobial Wound Biofilms Using a Unique Biofilm Flow Model.
    Srichaiyapol O; Maddocks SE; Thammawithan S; Daduang S; Klaynongsruang S; Patramanon R
    Microorganisms; 2022 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 36422349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of Poloxamer-Based Wound Dressings on
    Salisbury AM; Mullin M; Chen R; Percival SL
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2019 Oct; 8(10):463-468. PubMed ID: 31456903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antibiofilm efficacy of honey and bee-derived defensin-1 on multispecies wound biofilm.
    Sojka M; Valachova I; Bucekova M; Majtan J
    J Med Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 65(4):337-344. PubMed ID: 26861950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishment of a multi-species biofilm model to evaluate chlorhexidine efficacy.
    Touzel RE; Sutton JM; Wand ME
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 26597632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the antibacterial efficacy of silver nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.
    Wu D; Fan W; Kishen A; Gutmann JL; Fan B
    J Endod; 2014 Feb; 40(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 24461420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An insight into the antibiofilm properties of Costa Rican stingless bee honeys.
    Zamora LG; Beukelman CJ; van den Berg AJ; Aerts PC; Quarles van Ufford HC; Nijland R; Arias ML
    J Wound Care; 2017 Apr; 26(4):168-177. PubMed ID: 28379095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.