These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25648360)

  • 1. Radiology of foreign bodies: how do we image them?
    Ingraham CR; Mannelli L; Robinson JD; Linnau KF
    Emerg Radiol; 2015 Aug; 22(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 25648360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semi-quantitative scoring of imaging modalities in detecting soft tissue foreign bodies: an in vitro study.
    Alfuraih AM; Almutairi FN; Alotaibi SB; Alshmrani AA
    Acta Radiol; 2022 Apr; 63(4):474-480. PubMed ID: 33673754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of foreign bodies in the hand.
    Russell RC; Williamson DA; Sullivan JW; Suchy H; Suliman O
    J Hand Surg Am; 1991 Jan; 16(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1995686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study.
    Oikarinen KS; Nieminen TM; Mäkäräinen H; Pyhtinen J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1993 Apr; 22(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 8320449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.
    Javadrashid R; Fouladi DF; Golamian M; Hajalioghli P; Daghighi MH; Shahmorady Z; Niknejad MT
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140229. PubMed ID: 25426703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visibility of Different Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Plain Radiography, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
    Javadrashid R; Golamian M; Shahrzad M; Hajalioghli P; Shahmorady Z; Fouladi DF; Sadrarhami S; Akhoundzadeh L
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 May; 68(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 26899378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies by plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography.
    Ginsburg MJ; Ellis GL; Flom LL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1990 Jun; 19(6):701-3. PubMed ID: 2188542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imaging characteristics of intraocular foreign bodies: a comparative study of plain film X-ray, computed tomography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Modjtahedi BS; Rong A; Bobinski M; McGahan J; Morse LS
    Retina; 2015 Jan; 35(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 25090044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing foreign bodies in the foot.
    Pattamapaspong N; Srisuwan T; Sivasomboon C; Nasuto M; Suwannahoy P; Settakorn J; Kraisarin J; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2013 Mar; 118(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 22744349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation.
    Reiner B; Siegel E; McLaurin T; Pomerantz S; Allman R; Hebel JR; Fritz S; Protopapas Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 8659358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The detection of foreign bodies in soft tissue--comparison of conventional and digital radiography.
    Roobottom CA; Weston MJ
    Clin Radiol; 1994 May; 49(5):330-2. PubMed ID: 8013198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for detecting Foreign Bodies.
    Lari SS; Shokri A; Hosseinipanah SM; Rostami S; Sabounchi SS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 27207202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging foreign bodies.
    Faguy K
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):655-78; quiz 679-82. PubMed ID: 25002643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound versus radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies.
    Manthey DE; Storrow AB; Milbourn JM; Wagner BJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 8669741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detectability of foreign body materials using X-ray, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: A phantom study.
    Voss JO; Doll C; Raguse JD; Beck-Broichsitter B; Walter-Rittel T; Kahn J; Böning G; Maier C; Thieme N
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 135():109505. PubMed ID: 33421828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT more accurately detects foreign bodies within the equine foot than MRI or digital radiography.
    Ogden NKE; Milner PI; Stack JD; Talbot AM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2021 Mar; 62(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 33325609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retained Wooden Foreign Body in the Second Metatarsal.
    Abdelbaki A; Assani S; Bhatt N; Karol I; Feldman A
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 Mar; 108(2):168-171. PubMed ID: 29634308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed tomography, ultrasonography and plain radiography in the detection of foreign bodies in pork muscle tissue.
    Torfing KF; Teisen HG; Skjødt T
    Rofo; 1988 Jul; 149(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 2840712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foreign bodies.
    Hunter TB; Taljanovic MS
    Radiographics; 2003; 23(3):731-57. PubMed ID: 12740473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of acute wooden foreign bodies in the canine manus.
    Ober CP; Jones JC; Larson MM; Lanz OI; Werre SR
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(5):411-8. PubMed ID: 18833946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.