These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25648467)

  • 1. EUCALYPT: efficient tree reconciliation enumerator.
    Donati B; Baudet C; Sinaimeri B; Crescenzi P; Sagot MF
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2015; 10(1):3. PubMed ID: 25648467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring and Visualizing Spaces of Tree Reconciliations.
    Huber KT; Moulton V; Sagot MF; Sinaimeri B
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jul; 68(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 30418649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cophylogeny reconstruction via an approximate Bayesian computation.
    Baudet C; Donati B; Sinaimeri B; Crescenzi P; Gautier C; Matias C; Sagot MF
    Syst Biol; 2015 May; 64(3):416-31. PubMed ID: 25540454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capybara: equivalence ClAss enumeration of coPhylogenY event-BAsed ReconciliAtions.
    Wang Y; Mary A; Sagot MF; Sinaimeri B
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(14):4197-4199. PubMed ID: 32556075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Co-divergence and tree topology.
    Calamoneri T; Monti A; Sinaimeri B
    J Math Biol; 2019 Aug; 79(3):1149-1167. PubMed ID: 31203388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficiently sparse listing of classes of optimal cophylogeny reconciliations.
    Wang Y; Mary A; Sagot MF; Sinaimeri B
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2022 Feb; 17(1):2. PubMed ID: 35168648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A fast method for calculating reliable event supports in tree reconciliations via Pareto optimality.
    To TH; Jacox E; Ranwez V; Scornavacca C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():384. PubMed ID: 26573665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pareto-optimal phylogenetic tree reconciliation.
    Libeskind-Hadas R; Wu YC; Bansal MS; Kellis M
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):i87-95. PubMed ID: 24932009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconciliation revisited: handling multiple optima when reconciling with duplication, transfer, and loss.
    Bansal MS; Alm EJ; Kellis M
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):738-54. PubMed ID: 24033262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An efficient exact algorithm for computing all pairwise distances between reconciliations in the duplication-transfer-loss model.
    Santichaivekin S; Mawhorter R; Libeskind-Hadas R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 20):636. PubMed ID: 31842734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DTL reconciliation repair.
    Ma W; Smirnov D; Libeskind-Hadas R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 3):76. PubMed ID: 28361686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural properties of the reconciliation space and their applications in enumerating nearly-optimal reconciliations between a gene tree and a species tree.
    Wu T; Zhang L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S7. PubMed ID: 22151151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical clustering of maximum parsimony reconciliations.
    Mawhorter R; Libeskind-Hadas R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):612. PubMed ID: 31775628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian gene/species tree reconciliation and orthology analysis using MCMC.
    Arvestad L; Berglund AC; Lagergren J; Sennblad B
    Bioinformatics; 2003; 19 Suppl 1():i7-15. PubMed ID: 12855432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gene tree species tree reconciliation with gene conversion.
    Hasić D; Tannier E
    J Math Biol; 2019 May; 78(6):1981-2014. PubMed ID: 30767052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An efficient method for exploring the space of gene tree/species tree reconciliations in a probabilistic framework.
    Doyon JP; Hamel S; Chauve C
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 21464510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confounding factors in HGT detection: statistical error, coalescent effects, and multiple solutions.
    Than C; Ruths D; Innan H; Nakhleh L
    J Comput Biol; 2007 May; 14(4):517-35. PubMed ID: 17572027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconciliation Reconsidered: In Search of a Most Representative Reconciliation in the Duplication-Transfer-Loss Model.
    Grueter M; Duran K; Ramalingam R; Libeskind-Hadas R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(6):2136-2143. PubMed ID: 31722482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the Robustness of the Parsimonious Reconciliation Method in Host-Symbiont Cophylogeny.
    Urbini L; Sinaimeri B; Matias C; Sagot MF
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29993554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representing a set of reconciliations in a compact way.
    Scornavacca C; Paprotny W; Berry V; Ranwez V
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Apr; 11(2):1250025. PubMed ID: 23600816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.