These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25648620)
1. Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Mishra SK; Nawaz M; Satyapraksh MV; Parida S; Bidkar PU; Hemavathy B; Kundra P Anesthesiol Res Pract; 2015; 2015():705869. PubMed ID: 25648620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study. Brimacombe J; Keller C Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing leak pressure of LMA Chaki T; Koizumi M; Tachibana S; Matsumoto T; Kumagai T; Hashimoto Y; Yamakage M Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jan; 71(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 38017196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway. Keller C; Brimacombe J Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Xue FS; Mao P; Liu HP; Yang QY; Li CW; He N; Xu YC; Liao X Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices. Park SH; Han SH; Do SH; Kim JW; Kim JH Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA-ProSeal in different head and neck positions in anaesthetized and paralyzed patients; A prospective randomized study. Kerai S; Bhatt G; Saxena KN; Gaba P; Wadhwa B Indian J Anaesth; 2023 Feb; 67(2):201-206. PubMed ID: 37091441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis. Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children. Abdel-Ghaffar HS; Abdelal FA; Osman MA; Soliman OM Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial. Banerjee G; Jain D; Bala I; Gandhi K; Samujh R Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Feb; 62(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29491514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Mishra SK; Sivaraman B; Balachander H; Naggappa M; Parida S; Bhat RR; Yuvaraj K Anesth Essays Res; 2015; 9(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 26712973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Proseal LMA with i-Gel in children under controlled ventilation: a prospective randomised clinical study. Shiveshi P; Anandaswamy TC Braz J Anesthesiol; 2022; 72(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 33823205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between three second generation supraglottic airway devices during laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients. Kumar A; Sinha C; Kumar N; Kumar A; Kumar B; Kumar A; Kumar R Paediatr Anaesth; 2022 Jul; 32(7):843-850. PubMed ID: 35338764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Kim MS; Park JH; Lee KY; Choi SH; Jung HH; Kim JH; Lee B PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216673. PubMed ID: 31071171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation. Biedler A; Wrobel M; Schneider S; Soltész S; Ziegeler S; Grundmann U J Anesth; 2013 Oct; 27(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 23460409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure. Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]