BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25648731)

  • 1. Are Australians concerned about nanoparticles? A comparative analysis with established and emerging environmental health issues.
    Capon A; Rolfe M; Gillespie J; Smith W
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 39(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25648731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the risk from nanomaterials perceived as different from the risk of 'chemicals' by the Australian public?
    Capon A; Rolfe M; Gillespie J; Smith W
    Public Health Res Pract; 2016 Apr; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 27734061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.
    Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25928741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public Perceptions of Environmental Public Health Risks in the United States.
    Shin M; Werner AK; Strosnider H; Hines LB; Balluz L; Yip FY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Mar; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 30909505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia.
    Buys L; Aird R; van Megen K; Miller E; Sommerfeld J
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):170-88. PubMed ID: 23825246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of Risk-Benefit Perception and Trust on Medical Technology Acceptance in Relation to Drug and Device Lag: A Tripartite Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Todaka K; Kishimoto J; Ikeda M; Ikeda K; Yamamoto H
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2018 Sep; 52(5):629-640. PubMed ID: 29714546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pediatric environmental health: perceptions from a survey questionnaire.
    Chai SK; Robertson WO; Takaro T; Hagopian A; Beaudet N; Sechena R; Martin T; Simpson L; Barnhart S
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2001; 7(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11210011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study.
    Peters RG; Covello VT; McCallum DB
    Risk Anal; 1997 Feb; 17(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 9131825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concern and risk perception of osteoporosis and fracture among post-menopausal Australian women: results from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) cohort.
    Barcenilla-Wong AL; Chen JS; March LM
    Arch Osteoporos; 2013; 8():155. PubMed ID: 24105339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk perceptions in Australia.
    Finucane ML; Maybery MT
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Dec; 79(3 Pt 2):1331-8. PubMed ID: 9009790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining localized patterns of air quality perception in Texas: a spatial and statistical analysis.
    Brody SD; Peck BM; Highfield WE
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1561-74. PubMed ID: 15660612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal in Oslo harbor.
    Sparrevik M; Ellen GJ; Duijn M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 20809566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental Health Risk Perception: Adaptation of a Population-Based Questionnaire from Latin America.
    Cortés S; Burgos S; Adaros H; Lucero B; Quirós-Alcalá L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Perception of environmental health risks related to living in the vinicity of communal waste incineration plant--part II].
    Poznańska A; Stokwiszewski J; Goryński P; Wojtyniak B
    Przegl Epidemiol; 2009; 63(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 20120959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
    McComas KA; Besley JC
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk perception and water fluoridation support and opposition in Australia.
    Armfield JM; Akers HF
    J Public Health Dent; 2010; 70(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19694932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retest of a Principal Components Analysis of Two Household Environmental Risk Instruments.
    Oneal GA; Postma J; Odom-Maryon T; Butterfield P
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Aug; 39(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 27227487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public support for alcohol policies associated with knowledge of cancer risk.
    Buykx P; Gilligan C; Ward B; Kippen R; Chapman K
    Int J Drug Policy; 2015 Apr; 26(4):371-9. PubMed ID: 25217801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Farmers are the most trusted part of the Australian food chain: results from a national survey of consumers.
    Henderson J; Coveney J; Ward PR; Taylor AW
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2011 Aug; 35(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 21806725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.