170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25648953)
1. Wound edge protector for prevention of surgical site infection in laparotomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang MX; Sun YH; Xu Z; Zhou P; Wang HX; Wu YY
ANZ J Surg; 2015 May; 85(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 25648953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical effectiveness of wound edge protectors in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: meta-analysis.
Li X; Lin H; Zhu L; Chen J; Lei S; Li B; Su S
BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35543265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Edwards JP; Ho AL; Tee MC; Dixon E; Ball CG
Ann Surg; 2012 Jul; 256(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22584694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of Wound-Edge Protectors for Preventing Surgical Site Infections after Open Surgery for Colorectal Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study with Two Parallel Study Groups.
Kobayashi H; Uetake H; Yasuno M; Sugihara K
Dig Surg; 2019; 36(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 29698971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Sajid MS; Rathore MA; Sains P; Singh KK
Updates Surg; 2017 Mar; 69(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 28124278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis.
Zhang L; Elsolh B; Patel SV
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 29282577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are wound ring protectors effective in reducing surgical site infection post appendectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahmed K; Connelly TM; Bashar K; Walsh SR
Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 185(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 26560110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled trials.
Meyer J; Roos E; Davies RJ; Buchs NC; Ris F; Toso C
World J Surg; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1464-1474. PubMed ID: 36658232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost analysis of utilising wound edge protector in open appendicectomy to prevent surgical site infection.
Muniandy J; Azman A; Murugasan V; Alwi RI; Zuhdi Z; Jarmin R; Osman S
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2021 Aug; 68():102573. PubMed ID: 34354831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Abdominal Surgery: Are Ring Retractors Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ahmed K; Bashar K; Connelly TT; Fahey T; Walsh SR
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2016 Apr; 17(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 26784527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mihaljevic AL; Müller TC; Kehl V; Friess H; Kleeff J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121187. PubMed ID: 25816365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of wound-edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery.
Gheorghe A; Calvert M; Pinkney TD; Fletcher BR; Bartlett DC; Hawkins WJ; Mak T; Youssef H; Wilson S; ;
Ann Surg; 2012 Jun; 255(6):1017-29. PubMed ID: 22270692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of wound edge protectors in reducing the post-operative surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical studies.
Zhu Y; Jiang J
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2023 Dec; 18(4):541-550. PubMed ID: 38239586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction of surgical site infection using a novel intervention (ROSSINI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Pinkney TD; Bartlett DC; Hawkins W; Mak T; Youssef H; Futaba K; Harrison G; Gheorghe A; Bradbury JM; Calvert MJ; Dowswell G; Magill L; Redman V; Wilson S; Leaper D; Morton DG;
Trials; 2011 Oct; 12():217. PubMed ID: 21970469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wound-edge protection devices in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis.
Chen Q; Chen L; Chen G; Pu Y; Xing C
J Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 206(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 27884345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the clinical effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Kang SI; Oh HK; Kim MH; Kim MJ; Kim DW; Kim HJ; Kang SB
Surgery; 2018 Nov; 164(5):939-945. PubMed ID: 30098815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions.
Bhangu A; Singh P; Lundy J; Bowley DM
JAMA Surg; 2013 Aug; 148(8):779-86. PubMed ID: 23803860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Kuper TM; Murphy PB; Kaur B; Ott MC
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 31860549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Apisarnthanarak A; Singh N; Bandong AN; Madriaga G
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 25632999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Negative pressure therapy is effective in abdominal incision closure.
Kugler NW; Carver TW; Paul JS
J Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 203(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 27363660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
