These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25648953)

  • 1. Wound edge protector for prevention of surgical site infection in laparotomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang MX; Sun YH; Xu Z; Zhou P; Wang HX; Wu YY
    ANZ J Surg; 2015 May; 85(5):308-14. PubMed ID: 25648953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The clinical effectiveness of wound edge protectors in reducing surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: meta-analysis.
    Li X; Lin H; Zhu L; Chen J; Lei S; Li B; Su S
    BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35543265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wound protectors reduce surgical site infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Edwards JP; Ho AL; Tee MC; Dixon E; Ball CG
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jul; 256(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22584694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of Wound-Edge Protectors for Preventing Surgical Site Infections after Open Surgery for Colorectal Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study with Two Parallel Study Groups.
    Kobayashi H; Uetake H; Yasuno M; Sugihara K
    Dig Surg; 2019; 36(1):83-88. PubMed ID: 29698971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
    Sajid MS; Rathore MA; Sains P; Singh KK
    Updates Surg; 2017 Mar; 69(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 28124278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis.
    Zhang L; Elsolh B; Patel SV
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1111-1122. PubMed ID: 29282577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are wound ring protectors effective in reducing surgical site infection post appendectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ahmed K; Connelly TM; Bashar K; Walsh SR
    Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Feb; 185(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 26560110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled trials.
    Meyer J; Roos E; Davies RJ; Buchs NC; Ris F; Toso C
    World J Surg; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1464-1474. PubMed ID: 36658232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost analysis of utilising wound edge protector in open appendicectomy to prevent surgical site infection.
    Muniandy J; Azman A; Murugasan V; Alwi RI; Zuhdi Z; Jarmin R; Osman S
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2021 Aug; 68():102573. PubMed ID: 34354831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Abdominal Surgery: Are Ring Retractors Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Ahmed K; Bashar K; Connelly TT; Fahey T; Walsh SR
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2016 Apr; 17(2):138-51. PubMed ID: 26784527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wound edge protectors in open abdominal surgery to reduce surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mihaljevic AL; Müller TC; Kehl V; Friess H; Kleeff J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121187. PubMed ID: 25816365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of wound-edge protection devices in reducing surgical site infection in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery.
    Gheorghe A; Calvert M; Pinkney TD; Fletcher BR; Bartlett DC; Hawkins WJ; Mak T; Youssef H; Wilson S; ;
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jun; 255(6):1017-29. PubMed ID: 22270692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of wound edge protectors in reducing the post-operative surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical studies.
    Zhu Y; Jiang J
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2023 Dec; 18(4):541-550. PubMed ID: 38239586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction of surgical site infection using a novel intervention (ROSSINI): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Pinkney TD; Bartlett DC; Hawkins W; Mak T; Youssef H; Futaba K; Harrison G; Gheorghe A; Bradbury JM; Calvert MJ; Dowswell G; Magill L; Redman V; Wilson S; Leaper D; Morton DG;
    Trials; 2011 Oct; 12():217. PubMed ID: 21970469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wound-edge protection devices in gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis.
    Chen Q; Chen L; Chen G; Pu Y; Xing C
    J Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 206(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 27884345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the clinical effectiveness of impervious plastic wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
    Kang SI; Oh HK; Kim MH; Kim MJ; Kim DW; Kim HJ; Kang SB
    Surgery; 2018 Nov; 164(5):939-945. PubMed ID: 30098815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary vs delayed primary skin closure in contaminated and dirty abdominal incisions.
    Bhangu A; Singh P; Lundy J; Bowley DM
    JAMA Surg; 2013 Aug; 148(8):779-86. PubMed ID: 23803860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kuper TM; Murphy PB; Kaur B; Ott MC
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 31860549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the risk of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Apisarnthanarak A; Singh N; Bandong AN; Madriaga G
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 25632999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative pressure therapy is effective in abdominal incision closure.
    Kugler NW; Carver TW; Paul JS
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 203(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 27363660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.