These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25649715)

  • 1. Temporal variability predicts the magnitude of between-group attentional blink differences in developmental dyslexia: a meta-analysis.
    Badcock NA; Kidd JC
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e746. PubMed ID: 25649715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No evidence for a prolonged attentional blink in developmental dyslexia.
    McLean GM; Castles A; Coltheart V; Stuart GW
    Cortex; 2010; 46(10):1317-29. PubMed ID: 20800831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No differential attentional blink in dyslexia after controlling for baseline sensitivity.
    Badcock NA; Hogben JH; Fletcher JF
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(13):1497-502. PubMed ID: 18466946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The attentional blink in typically developing and reading-disabled children.
    de Groot BJ; van den Bos KP; van der Meulen BF; Minnaert AE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Nov; 139():51-70. PubMed ID: 26079274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dyslexia and practice in the attentional blink: evidence of slower task learning in dyslexia.
    Badcock NA; Hogben JH; Fletcher JF
    Cortex; 2011 Apr; 47(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 20409539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A case study of developmental phonological dyslexia: Is the attentional deficit in the perception of rapid stimuli sequences amodal?
    Lallier M; Donnadieu S; Berger C; Valdois S
    Cortex; 2010 Feb; 46(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 19446803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory and visual stream segregation in children and adults: an assessment of the amodality assumption of the 'sluggish attentional shifting' theory of dyslexia.
    Lallier M; Thierry G; Tainturier MJ; Donnadieu S; Peyrin C; Billard C; Valdois S
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1302():132-47. PubMed ID: 19631618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the duration of the attentional blink when viewing nature vs. urban scenes.
    Eich B; Beck MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1846-1867. PubMed ID: 37415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The attentional blink is related to phonemic decoding, but not sight-word recognition, in typically reading adults.
    Tyson-Parry MM; Sailah J; Boyes ME; Badcock NA
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):8-16. PubMed ID: 26277018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children with dyslexia: evidence for visual attention deficits in perception of rapid sequences of objects.
    Visser TA; Boden C; Giaschi DE
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(21):2521-35. PubMed ID: 15358087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional blink deficits observed in dyslexia depend on task demands.
    Buchholz J; Aimola Davies A
    Vision Res; 2007 May; 47(10):1292-302. PubMed ID: 17408718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual temporal processing in dyslexia and the magnocellular deficit theory: the need for speed?
    McLean GM; Stuart GW; Coltheart V; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1957-75. PubMed ID: 21823808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of inhibition level on field-dependent and field-independent individuals in attentional blink.
    Yao Y; Diao D
    Psychol Res; 2024 Feb; 88(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 37407850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships between attentional blink magnitude, RSVP target accuracy, and performance on other cognitive tasks.
    Arnell KM; Howe AE; Joanisse MF; Klein RM
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1472-83. PubMed ID: 17263072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional blink differences between adolescent dyslexic and normal readers.
    Lacroix GL; Constantinescu I; Cousineau D; de Almeida RG; Segalowitz N; Grünau Mv
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 15708200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences within and across attentional blink tasks revisited.
    Dale G; Dux PE; Arnell KM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):456-67. PubMed ID: 23319149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sparing and impairing: Emotion modulation of the attentional blink and the spread of sparing in a 3-target RSVP task.
    Petrucci M; Pecchinenda A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):439-452. PubMed ID: 29243207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The change of attentional blink and repetition blindness after cerebellar lesions.
    Jiang Y; Tian Y; Wang K
    J Clin Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1742-6. PubMed ID: 24055206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of distractors in rapid serial visual presentation reveals the mechanism of attentional blink by EEG-based univariate and multivariate analyses.
    Meng Z; Chen Q; Zhou L; Xu L; Chen A
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Oct; 33(21):10761-10769. PubMed ID: 37702253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the blink: the importance of target-distractor similarity in eliciting an attentional blink with faces.
    Müsch K; Engel AK; Schneider TR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41257. PubMed ID: 22815982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.