These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25650079)

  • 21. Fixed and mobile-bearing total ankle prostheses: Effect on tibial bone strain.
    Terrier A; Fernandes CS; Guillemin M; Crevoisier X
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Oct; 48():57-62. PubMed ID: 28755611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement.
    Agarwal S; Azam A; Morgan-Jones R
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1640-4. PubMed ID: 24293593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibia behaviour with the use of femoral stems in revision TKA: an in vitro and finite element analysis.
    Completo A; Rego A; Fonseca F; Ramos A; Relvas C; Simões JA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Feb; 25(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 19944503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.
    Gibon E; Vasilopoulos T; Sipavicius E; Deen JT; Prieto HA; Gray CF; Parvataneni HK; Pulido L
    Iowa Orthop J; 2022 Jun; 42(1):145-153. PubMed ID: 35821926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.
    Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.
    Jensen CL; Petersen MM; Schrøder HM; Lund B
    Int Orthop; 2012 Sep; 36(9):1857-63. PubMed ID: 22733440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of design features of tibial stems in total knee arthroplasty on tibial bone remodeling behaviors.
    Jia Z; Gong H; Hu S; Fang J; Fan R
    Med Eng Phys; 2017 Oct; 48():103-113. PubMed ID: 28764879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce strain at the proximal tibia.
    Bottlang M; Erne OK; Lacatusu E; Sommers MB; Kessler O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():105-11. PubMed ID: 16456313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components.
    Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Iwaki H; Ikebuchi M; Inori F; Takaoka K
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):700-6. PubMed ID: 20194329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of tibial component fixation techniques on resorption of supporting bone stock after total knee replacement.
    Chong DY; Hansen UN; van der Venne R; Verdonschot N; Amis AA
    J Biomech; 2011 Mar; 44(5):948-54. PubMed ID: 21236431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A finite element analysis of tibial tritanium cones without stems in varying bone defects.
    Xie S; Conlisk N; Hamilton D; Scott C; Burnett R; Pankaj P
    Knee; 2020 Jun; 27(3):656-666. PubMed ID: 32563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients.
    Villanueva-Martínez M; De la Torre-Escudero B; Rojo-Manaute JM; Ríos-Luna A; Chana-Rodriguez F
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 23414934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bone loss following knee arthroplasty: potential treatment options.
    Vasso M; Beaufils P; Cerciello S; Schiavone Panni A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Apr; 134(4):543-53. PubMed ID: 24519708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Alexander GE; Bernasek TL; Crank RL; Haidukewych GJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Apr; 28(4):604-7. PubMed ID: 23123042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A parametric analysis of fixation post shape in tibial knee prostheses.
    Au AG; Liggins AB; Raso VJ; Amirfazli A
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 15642508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are Stems Redundant in Times of Metaphyseal Sleeve Fixation?
    Scior W; Chanda D; Graichen H
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2444-2448. PubMed ID: 31301910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stemmed femoral knee prostheses: effects of prosthetic design and fixation on bone loss.
    van Lenthe GH; Willems MM; Verdonschot N; de Waal Malefijt MC; Huiskes R
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Dec; 73(6):630-7. PubMed ID: 12553509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early results of the use of tantalum femoral cones for revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Howard JL; Kudera J; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):478-84. PubMed ID: 21368080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty for five years-a matched cohort study.
    Minoda Y; Kobayashi A; Ikebuchi M; Iwaki H; Inori F; Nakamura H
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1760-4. PubMed ID: 23642446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.