689 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25650816)
1. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis vs Sweet esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial.
Li B; Xiang J; Zhang Y; Li H; Zhang J; Sun Y; Hu H; Miao L; Ma L; Luo X; Chen S; Ye T; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Chen H
JAMA Surg; 2015 Apr; 150(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 25650816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Yang X; Zhan C; Sun F; Chen L; Shi M; Jiang W; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):979-984. PubMed ID: 27680063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Efficacy comparison between two-field and three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].
Lin D; Ye T; Ma L; Shao L; Song Z; Jiang S; Xiang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):990-994. PubMed ID: 27680065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Ivor-Lewis versus Sweet procedure for middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A STROBE compliant study.
Wang J; Wei N; Jiang N; Lu Y; Zhang X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(6):e14416. PubMed ID: 30732195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with two-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus].
Wu J; Chai Y; Zhou XM; Chen QX; Yan FL
Ai Zheng; 2007 Mar; 26(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 17355797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial experience of total thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Merritt RE
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Apr; 22(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 22393924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.
Salem AI; Thau MR; Strom TJ; Abbott AM; Saeed N; Almhanna K; Hoffe SE; Shridhar R; Karl RC; Meredith KL
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jan; 30(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27149640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Tapias LF; Morse CR
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 21967644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown oesophagectomy in Chinese patients with stage IA-IIIB oesophageal squamous cell cancer: a multicentre, non-interventional and observational study.
Zhang T; Hou X; Li Y; Fu X; Liu L; Xu L; Liu Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):812-819. PubMed ID: 32285107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ivor Lewis approach is superior to transhiatal approach in retrieval of lymph nodes at esophagectomy.
Wolff CS; Castillo SF; Larson DR; O'Byrne MM; Fredericksen M; Deschamps C; Allen MS; Zais TG; Romero Y
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 18477255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The sweet approach is still worthwhile in modern esophagectomy.
Ma J; Zhan C; Wang L; Jiang W; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Wang Q
Ann Thorac Surg; 2014 May; 97(5):1728-33. PubMed ID: 24650587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Regulations and lymphadenectomy strategy of mediastinal and upper abdominal lymph node metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma].
Xue HC; Wu CR; Zhang ZB; Zhu ZH; Ma ZK; Gao J
Ai Zheng; 2007 Sep; 26(9):1020-4. PubMed ID: 17927865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Compared with open approach.
Zhang Z; Xu M; Guo M; Liu X
Int J Surg; 2017 Sep; 45():98-104. PubMed ID: 28778695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma in the middle thoracic esophagus after modified Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Chen G; Wang Z; Liu XY; Liu FY
World J Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 17426905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of the effect of lymph node dissection performed by Ivor-Lewis or left-sided thoracic esophagogastrectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction].
Duan XF; Gong L; Ma MQ; Yue J; Tang P; Shang XB; Jiang HJ; Yu ZT
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 39(3):190-194. PubMed ID: 28316217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative analysis on the classic and modified Ivor-Lewis procedure in the treatment of mid-low thoracic esophageal carcinoma].
Zhen FX; Luo JH; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1180-2. PubMed ID: 24369401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A meta-analysis of esophagectomy: the comparative study of Ivor-Lewis operation and Sweet operation].
Zhang H; Wang J; Wang W; Zhou L; Chen J; Yang B; Xia Y; Jiang T
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 25273658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Qi W; Zixiang W; Tianwei Z; Shuai F; Sai Z; Gang S; Ming W
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 117(5):957-969. PubMed ID: 29878389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Recurrence patterns of esophageal cancer after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy--a report of 196 cases].
Chen G; Wang Z; Liu XY; Liu FY
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jan; 25(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 16405760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
