236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25650901)
1. Histological validation of cone-beam computed tomography versus laser fluorescence and conventional diagnostic methods for occlusal caries detection.
Ozturk E; Sinanoglu A
Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Feb; 33(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 25650901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis of occlusal caries using laser fluorescence versus conventional methods in permanent posterior teeth: a clinical study.
Sinanoglu A; Ozturk E; Ozel E
Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 Mar; 32(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 24456171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variables affecting the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of ICDAS for occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent molars.
Qudeimat MA; Alomari QD; Altarakemah Y; Alshawaf N; Honkala EJ
J Public Health Dent; 2016; 76(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 26095924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new fluorescence-based device in the detection of incipient occlusal caries lesions.
Achilleos EE; Rahiotis C; Kakaboura A; Vougiouklakis G
Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Jan; 28(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 22576667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions for occlusal surfaces.
Valera FB; Pessan JP; Valera RC; Mondelli J; Percinoto C
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18435372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods.
Attrill DC; Ashley PF
Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(8):440-3. PubMed ID: 11352392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative in vitro validation of VistaProof and DIAGNOdent pen for occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth.
Seremidi K; Lagouvardos P; Kavvadia K
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 22166109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic validity of the use of ICDAS II and DIAGNOdent pen verified by micro-computed tomography for the detection of occlusal caries lesions-an in vitro evaluation.
Luczaj-Cepowicz E; Marczuk-Kolada G; Obidzinska M; Sidun J
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 34(8):1655-1663. PubMed ID: 31201666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of diagnodent in detection of occlusal caries in children.
Olmez A; Tuna D; Oznurhan F
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 30(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 16937852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of Different Methods for Detection of Incipient Occlusal Caries Lesions: An In Vitro Study.
Akgul S; Bala O; Yikilgan İ
Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Apr; 36(4):191-197. PubMed ID: 29261013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence and the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) in diagnosis of occlusal caries in permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
Castilho LS; Cotta FV; Bueno AC; Moreira AN; Ferreira EF; Magalhães CS
Eur J Oral Sci; 2016 Apr; 124(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26917102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
Mitropoulos P; Rahiotis C; Stamatakis H; Kakaboura A
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):859-67. PubMed ID: 20654681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Different Methods in Detecting Incipient Non-Cavitated Occlusal Caries Lesions in Permanent Teeth.
Ünal M; Koçkanat A; Güler S; Gültürk E
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(3):173-179. PubMed ID: 30964722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo and in vitro comparison of ICDAS II, DIAGNOdent pen, CarieScan PRO and SoproLife camera for occlusal caries detection in primary molar teeth.
Kockanat A; Unal M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Jun; 18(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 28598179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of ICDAS II and fluorescence methods on detection of occlusal caries-An ex vivo study.
Marczuk-Kolada G; Luczaj-Cepowicz E; Obidzinska M; Rozycki J
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2020 Mar; 29():101609. PubMed ID: 31778796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of high-powered magnification to detect occlusal caries in primary teeth.
Mendes FM; Ganzerla E; Nunes AF; Puig AV; Imparato JC
Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 16555652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro comparison of laser fluorescence performance with visual examination for detection of occlusal caries in permanent and primary molars.
Rodrigues JA; Diniz MB; Josgrilberg EB; Cordeiro RC
Lasers Med Sci; 2009 Jul; 24(4):501-6. PubMed ID: 18373155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
