These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25650947)

  • 1. Statistical analysis and reporting: common errors found during peer review and how to avoid them.
    Worthy G
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2015; 145():w14076. PubMed ID: 25650947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved reporting of statistical design and analysis: guidelines, education, and editorial policies.
    Mazumdar M; Banerjee S; Van Epps HL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 620():563-98. PubMed ID: 20652522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting statistical analyses in peer review journal articles.
    Stephens R; Grant MJ
    Health Info Libr J; 2015 Jun; 32(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 25943969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles.
    Dexter F; Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 124(3):943-947. PubMed ID: 27676281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sharing Your Practice Expertise: Writing Clinical Manuscripts for Publication.
    McGrath JM; Brandon D
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2015 Aug; 15(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 26225587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
    Morton JP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice.
    Diong J; Butler AA; Gandevia SC; Héroux ME
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202121. PubMed ID: 30110371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
    Erb HN
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):165-74. PubMed ID: 20951447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Statistics must be seen and scrutinized! Fundamental to the progress of medical science--yet neglected in medical journals].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5176-9. PubMed ID: 12572313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thoughts on the end of the article: the implications for nursing practice.
    Becker PT
    Res Nurs Health; 2009 Jun; 32(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 19280621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lies, damn lies and statistics: errors and omission in papers submitted to INJURY 2010-2012.
    Prescott RJ; Civil I
    Injury; 2013 Jan; 44(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 23182752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness.
    Henly SJ; Bennett JA; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 20637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer reviews: the dreaded rejection.
    Venkatesh S; Maymone MB; Vashi NA
    Dermatol Online J; 2018 Mar; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 29634877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focus on peer review.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(6):371. PubMed ID: 21048481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conference presentations: a guide to writing the abstract.
    Happell B
    Nurse Res; 2008; 15(4):79-87. PubMed ID: 18700662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of time-to-event methods in dental research: a comparison based on five dental journals over a 11-year period.
    Vähänikkilä H; Miettunen J; Tjäderhane L; Larmas M; Nieminen P
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 40 Suppl 1():36-42. PubMed ID: 22369707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.
    Stratton IM; Neil A
    Diabet Med; 2005 Apr; 22(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 15787658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Review of research design and statistical methods in Chinese Journal of Cardiology].
    Zhang LJ; Yu JM
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 37(7):648-53. PubMed ID: 19961741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.