These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25650947)

  • 21. Statistical Data Editing in Scientific Articles.
    Habibzadeh F
    J Korean Med Sci; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 28581261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration.
    Mansournia MA; Collins GS; Nielsen RO; Nazemipour M; Jewell NP; Altman DG; Campbell MJ
    Br J Sports Med; 2021 Sep; 55(18):1009-1017. PubMed ID: 33514558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research.
    Henly SJ; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2009; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 19150263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recommendations for describing statistical studies and results in general readership science and engineering journals.
    Gardenier JS
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Dec; 18(4):651-62. PubMed ID: 21327724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Writing good abstracts.
    Alexandrov AV; Hennerici MG
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2007; 23(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 17199082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature.
    O'Leary JD; Crawford MW
    Can J Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 60(8):813-21. PubMed ID: 23760791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How statistical expertise is used in medical research.
    Altman DG; Goodman SN; Schroter S
    JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2817-20. PubMed ID: 12038922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
    Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
    Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
    Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How to review a paper for Heart.
    Otto CM
    Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The null hypothesis: closing the gap between good intentions and good studies.
    Meldrum DR; Sammel MD; Barnhart K
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jul; 96(1):6-10.e2. PubMed ID: 21723439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using databases in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 77.
    Cleland J; Scott N; Harrild K; Moffat M
    Med Teach; 2013 May; 35(5):e1103-22. PubMed ID: 23621147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
    Clarke SP
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistics.
    Rutkowski JL
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Jun; 37(3):299. PubMed ID: 21663452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Qualitative research articles: information for authors and peer reviewers.
    Rowan M; Huston P
    CMAJ; 1997 Nov; 157(10):1442-6. PubMed ID: 9371080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
    Kearney MH; Freda MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [How I review an original scientific paper].
    Hoppin FG
    Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Nov; 20(5 Pt 1):671-8. PubMed ID: 14631245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A common standard for conflict of interest disclosure in addiction journals.
    Goozner M; Caplan A; Moreno J; Kramer BS; Babor TF; Husser WC
    Addiction; 2009 Nov; 104(11):1779-84. PubMed ID: 19832777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: what editors and reviewers want authors to know.
    Harris AH; Reeder R; Hyun JK
    J Psychiatr Res; 2009 Oct; 43(15):1231-4. PubMed ID: 19435635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.