These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25651202)
21. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties. Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry. Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in edematous corneas before and after Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty. Chang DT; Pantcheva MB; Noecker RJ Cornea; 2010 Oct; 29(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 20548237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R; Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Outcomes of trabeculectomy after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison with penetrating keratoplasty. Boey PY; Mehta JS; Ho CL; Tan DT; Wong TT Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1091-8.e2. PubMed ID: 22397954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty. Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with pre-existing glaucoma. Quek DT; Wong T; Tan D; Mehta JS Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jul; 152(1):48-54.e2. PubMed ID: 21570672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Oh JH; Yoo C; Kim YY; Kim HM; Song JS Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 18843499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]