154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25651707)
41. Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer Sysmex XN-series.
Seo JY; Lee ST; Kim SH
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Apr; 37(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 24815300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000.
Bruegel M; Nagel D; Funk M; Fuhrmann P; Zander J; Teupser D
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jun; 53(7):1057-71. PubMed ID: 25720071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential.
Pierre RV
Clin Lab Med; 2002 Mar; 22(1):279-97. PubMed ID: 11933579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Stability of hematological analytes depends on the hematology analyser used: a stability study with Bayer Advia 120, Beckman Coulter LH 750 and Sysmex XE 2100.
Imeri F; Herklotz R; Risch L; Arbetsleitner C; Zerlauth M; Risch GM; Huber AR
Clin Chim Acta; 2008 Nov; 397(1-2):68-71. PubMed ID: 18706900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer for white blood cell analysis in cerebrospinal fluid.
Perné A; Hainfellner JA; Womastek I; Haushofer A; Szekeres T; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Feb; 136(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 22288968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Automated analysis of pleural fluid total and differential leukocyte counts with the Sysmex XE-2100.
de Jonge R; Brouwer R; van Rijn M; van Acker BA; Otten HJ; Lindemans J
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(11):1367-71. PubMed ID: 17087651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.
Ye X; Fang L; Chen Y; Tong J; Ning X; Feng L; Xu Y; Yang D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Jun; 46(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38212663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Flow cytometric lymphocyte subset enumeration: 10 years of external quality assessment in the Benelux countries.
Levering WH; van Wieringen WN; Kraan J; van Beers WA; Sintnicolaas K; van Rhenen DJ; Gratama JW
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 17849485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The use of CellaVision competency software for external quality assessment and continuing professional development.
Horiuchi Y; Tabe Y; Idei M; Bengtsson HI; Ishii K; Horii T; Miyake K; Satoh N; Miida T; Ohsaka A
J Clin Pathol; 2011 Jul; 64(7):610-7. PubMed ID: 21515694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [External assessment of analytic quality in hematology: a necessity in Latin America].
Fink NE; Fernández Alberti A; Mazziotta D
Rev Panam Salud Publica; 1997 Sep; 2(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 9445764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Comparative and simultaneous evaluation of three automated counters in hematology: Coulter STKS, Sysmex NE 8000, Technicon H-2].
Cart-Lamy P; Pernod G; Pirraud M; Drevait JM; Caillat D; Polack B; Kolodié L
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1993; 51(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 8172402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparative evaluation of platelet counts in two hematology analyzers and potential effects on prophylactic platelet transfusion decisions.
Hummel K; Sachse M; Hoffmann JJML; van Dun LPJM
Transfusion; 2018 Oct; 58(10):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 30222860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An evaluation of the Beckman-Coulter AcT 3-part differential haematology analyzer in a tertiary hospital laboratory.
Biambo HI; Ejele OA; Nwauche CA
Niger J Med; 2005; 14(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 16083243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of hematological values obtained with reference automated hematology analyzers of six manufacturers.
Takubo T; Tatsumi N; Satoh N; Matsuno K; Fujimoto K; Soga M; Yamagami Y; Akiba S; Sudoh T; Miyazaki M
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2002; 33 Suppl 2():62-7. PubMed ID: 12755270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Performance evaluation of BC-3200 hematology analyzer in a university hospital.
Peng L; Bai L; Nie L; Wu Z; Yan C
Int J Lab Hematol; 2008 Jun; 30(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 18479299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of the QBC Star centrifugal three-part differential haematology system.
Erhabor O; Richardson G; Mohammed I; Thornton C; Bark J; Hurst M; Hamer D; Kinsella P
Br J Biomed Sci; 2013; 70(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 23888608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Current status and proposal of a guideline for manual slide review of automated complete blood cell count and white blood cell differential].
Woo HY; Shin SY; Park H; Kim YJ; Kim HJ; Lee YK; Chae SL; Chang YH; Choi JR; Han K; Cho SR; Kwon KC
Korean J Lab Med; 2010 Dec; 30(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 21157139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Guidelines for organisation and management of external quality assessment using proficiency testing. Expert Panel on Cytometry of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology.
England JM; Rowan RM; van Assendelft OW; Bull BS; Coulter WH; Fujimoto K; Groner W; van Hove L; Jones AR; Kanter RJ; Klee G; Koepke JA; Lewis SM; d'Onofrio G; Tatsumi N; McLaren CE
Int J Hematol; 1998 Jul; 68(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9713167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Verification of the Performance of a Fully Automated Coagulation Analyzer and Ongoing Assessment of External Quality Assurance Results in an Academic Laboratory in South Africa.
Louw S; Wan YO; Mayne ES
Clin Lab; 2019 Jul; 65(7):. PubMed ID: 31307171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Implementation of Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) guidelines within the External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL).
Todd CA; Sanchez AM; Garcia A; Denny TN; Sarzotti-Kelsoe M
J Immunol Methods; 2014 Jul; 409():91-8. PubMed ID: 24120573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
